On Thu March 4 2004 17:45, Andreas Saurwein wrote:
> At 4/3/2004 18:16 Thursday, Dave Aronson wrote:
> > Either way (especially if the manual forwarding is done with the
> > help of pulling up the contact list), you can bet some jackass
> > will attach a malicious payload, probably triggered ri
On Thursday 04 March 2004 10:17 am, Andreas Saurwein wrote:
> On a somewhat abstract line of thinking, in regards to the latest
> virus outbreaks, one idea came up which might be even useful:
>
> I think that we all agree that the current outbreak of Netsky, Bagle
> and others is mainly because use
At 4/3/2004 18:16 Thursday, Dave Aronson wrote:
Those of us who receive viri, or bounce-reports alleging that we sent
one, are in the addressbooks of lusers who open viri. Don't subject us
to more of this $#!^ than we already are.
At the moment I receive about 20-25 virus/bounces by day on my pers
On Thu March 4 2004 10:17, Andreas Saurwein wrote:
> Now, doing something really flashy like creating an virus like
> application as follows:
> * it is sent as zipped attachment
> * when opened, it brings a huge, clear message, that the user would
> now have been infected with a virus. A shor
On a somewhat abstract line of thinking, in regards to the latest virus
outbreaks, one idea came up which might be even useful:
I think that we all agree that the current outbreak of Netsky, Bagle and
others is mainly because users still try to open everything they receive,
no matter how weird
