To: Peter Neumann; Secure Code Mailing List
Subject: Re: [SC-L] What do you like better Web penetration testing or
static code analysis?
I hereby resonate with my esteemed colleague and mentor pgn. But no puns
from me.
gem
On 4/22/10 1:57 PM, Peter Neumann neum...@csl.sri.com wrote
...@securecoding.org [mailto:sc-l-boun...@securecoding.org]
On Behalf Of Gary McGraw
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 2:15 PM
To: Peter Neumann; Secure Code Mailing List
Subject: Re: [SC-L] What do you like better Web penetration testing or
static code analysis?
I hereby resonate with my esteemed
Brian Chess wrote:
I like your point Matt. Everybody who's responded thus-far has wanted to
turn this into a discussion about what's most effective or what has the most
benefit, sort of like we were comparing which icky medicine to take or which
overcooked vegetable to eat. Maybe they don't
Neumann; Secure Code Mailing List
Subject: Re: [SC-L] What do you like better Web penetration testing or
static code analysis?
I hereby resonate with my esteemed colleague and mentor pgn. But no puns
from me.
gem
On 4/22/10 1:57 PM, Peter Neumann neum...@csl.sri.com wrote:
Matt Parsons
Neumann; Secure Code Mailing List
Subject: Re: [SC-L] What do you like better Web penetration testing or static
code analysis?
I hereby resonate with my esteemed colleague and mentor pgn. But no puns from
me.
gem
On 4/22/10 1:57 PM, Peter Neumann neum...@csl.sri.com wrote:
Matt Parsons
Matt Parsons wrote:
What do you like doing better as application security professionals, web
penetration testing or static code analysis?
McGovern, James F. (P+C Technology) wrote:
Should a security professional have a preference when both have
different value propositions? While there is
What do you like doing better as application security professionals, web
penetration testing or static code analysis?
I offered my thoughts in today's blog.
http://parsonsisconsulting.blogspot.com/2010/04/what-do-you-like-better-secu
re-code.html
Matt Parsons, MSM, CISSP
