the anwser.
Regards,
George
Greenarrow1
InNetInvestigations-Forensics
[Ed. Let's please let this thread drop now, ok? KRvW]
- Original Message -
From: "Nick FitzGerald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 3:31 PM
Subje
"Greenarrow 1" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I feel government should not become involved with the internet and/or its
> security. For one if people look at the governments security most
> departments have a grade of C or below. ...
Not that I'm trying to suggest that "the government" -- I gues
InNetInvestigations-Forensics
- Original Message -
From: "Kenneth R. van Wyk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 8:07 AM
Subject: Re: [SC-L] Yoran on the state of software security
> Greetings all,
>
> I was asked to clarify
Greetings all,
I was asked to clarify what I posted yesterday re Amit Yoran's recent public
statements on the topic of software security.
On Tuesday 20 April 2004 03:27, an SC-L reader wrote:
> Ken, could you clarify a little please?
Happy to, see below.
> I detect a slighly snide tone that su
FYI, in addition to the report released today by the National Cyber Security
Partnership on "Cyber Security Technical Standards and Common Criteria" (see
http://www.cyberpartnership.org/041904.html), there's an article in eWeek
quoting Amit Yoran on his take on the state of software security (se
