> I have no problems with someone pointing out flaws in XYZ product
> when compared to ABC product, provided:
> a) they're an independent, uninvolved 3rd party
> and
> b) the two products are identical in feature, function, and purpose.
Speaking personally, I'd say
or
c) The comparison is hones
A couple key phrases come to mind when reading this:
1) conflict of interest (he's selling "a solution")
2) inappropriate comparison (embedded OS vs. general OS)
I have no problems with someone pointing out flaws in XYZ product when compared to ABC
product, provided:
a) they're an independent,
