Hi Fransisco,
definitely - the principles are the same. I used
this a couple of years ago to bring a group from
0 to lvl 1... Of course what really tends to
happen is that some parts actually move to 3+
whilst others only just make it to 1 level - and
by the rules of CMM you can only claim the level
that all processes have achieved.
This may be your confusion as SSE-CMM spends more
time talking about this that CMMI
Cheers,
Bret
At 07:00 PM 8/10/2007, Francisco Nunes wrote:
>Dear list members.
>
>After reading SSE-CMM, I became confused whether
>SSE-CMM can be used to improve their PAs like CMMI
>does, i.e., both improve in continuous or in staged
>way.
>
>Please, what are your opinions?
>
>Thank you.
>
>Yours sincerely,
>Francisco.
>
>
> Abra sua conta no Yahoo! Mail, o único
> sem limite de espaço para armazenamento!
>http://br.mail.yahoo.com/
>___
>Secure Coding mailing list (SC-L) SC-L@securecoding.org
>List information, subscriptions, etc - http://krvw.com/mailman/listinfo/sc-l
>List charter available at - http://www.securecoding.org/list/charter.php
>SC-L is hosted and moderated by KRvW Associates, LLC (http://www.KRvW.com)
>as a free, non-commercial service to the software security community.
>___
___
Secure Coding mailing list (SC-L) SC-L@securecoding.org
List information, subscriptions, etc - http://krvw.com/mailman/listinfo/sc-l
List charter available at - http://www.securecoding.org/list/charter.php
SC-L is hosted and moderated by KRvW Associates, LLC (http://www.KRvW.com)
as a free, non-commercial service to the software security community.
___
