Re: [SC-L] FW: What's the next tech problem to be solvedin softwaresecurity?

2007-06-10 Thread David Crocker
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of SC-L Subscriber Dave Aronson Sent: 07 June 2007 13:53 To: SC-L@securecoding.org Subject: Re: [SC-L] FW: What's the next tech problem to be solvedin softwaresecurity? Michael S Hines [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Product integration - why have

Re: [SC-L] FW: What's the next tech problem to be solvedin softwaresecurity?

2007-06-10 Thread ljknews
At 9:51 PM +0100 6/9/07, David Crocker wrote: If instead we pay people to perform the more skilled tasks of establishing requirements and specifying the systems to meet them, and use computers to generate programs that meet the specifications, then such things as freedom from buffer

Re: [SC-L] FW: What's the next tech problem to be solvedin softwaresecurity?

2007-06-10 Thread Robert C. Seacord
ljknews, Yes, it is virtually impossible to get a serious runtime error in an Ada program. For example: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kYUrqdUyEpI rCs At 9:51 PM +0100 6/9/07, David Crocker wrote: If instead we pay people to perform the more skilled tasks of establishing requirements

Re: [SC-L] FW: What's the next tech problem to be solvedin softwaresecurity?

2007-06-10 Thread ljknews
At 9:16 AM -0400 6/10/07, Robert C. Seacord wrote: ljknews, Yes, it is virtually impossible to get a serious runtime error in an Ada program. For example: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kYUrqdUyEpI It amazes me that someone in a discussion of software security would point to a page that