Re: [SC-L] Secure programming is NOT just good programming

2006-10-12 Thread Gary McGraw
:24:35 2006 To: David A. Wheeler Cc: sc-l@securecoding.org Subject:Re: [SC-L] Secure programming is NOT just good programming | Here are some practices you should typically be doing | if you're worried about security, and note that many are | typically NOT considered good programming

Re: [SC-L] Secure programming is NOT just good programming

2006-10-12 Thread Kenneth Van Wyk
On Oct 12, 2006, at 4:32 PM, Gary McGraw wrote: I suppose now is as good a time as any to say that everything david is talking about here is described in great detail in the HOW TO book that I released last february. If you're reading this list, you really should read that book. It's

Re: [SC-L] Secure programming is NOT just good programming

2006-10-12 Thread Leichter, Jerry
| The only way forward is by having the *computer* do this kind of | thing for us. The requirements of the task are very much like those | of low-level code optimization: We leave that to the compilers today, | because hardly anyone can do it well at all, much less competitively | with

Re: [SC-L] Secure programming is NOT just good programming

2006-10-12 Thread mikeiscool
On 10/13/06, David A. Wheeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: mikeiscool claimed: Secure programming is good programming. Most books teach good programming. I strongly disagree with you, on both counts. As is your right :) At the least, those who say they practice good programming practices,