Re: RHEL 7.4 oscap-anaconda - profile descriptions

2017-08-03 Thread Shawn Wells


On 8/3/17 2:53 PM, Shawn Wells wrote:
>
>
> On 8/3/17 11:35 AM, Watson Yuuma Sato wrote:
>> On 03/08/17 15:36, Watson Yuuma Sato wrote:
>>> On 03/08/17 11:07, Marek Haicman wrote:
 On 08/03/2017 02:28 AM, Shawn Wells wrote:
> Hey Guys
>
>  Just downloaded the RHEL 7.4 installation media and attempted
> to use the oscap-anaconda features. Selected "security" during the
> installer, and noticed a few things:
>
> (1) The CUI/NIST 800-171 profile has the description from OSPP:
>
>
> (2) There are multiple RHEL7 STIG options:
>
>
> I'm not sure how/why this is happening.
>
> The 800-171 profile does extend OSPP. Do we need a "extends" for
> the profile description field?
> https://github.com/OpenSCAP/scap-security-guide/blob/master/RHEL/7/input/profiles/nist-800-171-cui.xml
>
>
>
>
> ___
> scap-security-guide mailing list --
> scap-security-guide@lists.fedorahosted.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> scap-security-guide-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org
>
 Hey Shawn,
 ad (2) this is known issue
 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1437106

 For (1) that description is the same that SCAP Workbench displays,
 and oscap generates from the guides (as can be seen
 http://static.open-scap.org/ssg-guides/ssg-rhel7-guide-index.html).
   Extend concatenates description of extended profile and the
 extending one. Is it a bug?
>>> This is not a bug.
>>> To replace extended description, extending description element
>>> should have attribute override="true", like the title element has.
>> Well, this is a bug if description of CUI/NIST 800-171 is not
>> expected to be appended to description of OSPP Profile. 
>
> IMHO it comes down to the profiles not including "override=true" in
> the profile descriptions.
>
> Never knew they were needed. How come we didn't have this problem in
> earlier editions of oscap-anaconda? The profiles don't seem to have
> override=true in the description field, but in prior RHEL releases
> things were OK.

PR submitted:
https://github.com/OpenSCAP/scap-security-guide/pull/2203
___
scap-security-guide mailing list -- scap-security-guide@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to scap-security-guide-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org


Re: RHEL 7.4 oscap-anaconda - profile descriptions

2017-08-03 Thread Shawn Wells


On 8/3/17 11:35 AM, Watson Yuuma Sato wrote:
> On 03/08/17 15:36, Watson Yuuma Sato wrote:
>> On 03/08/17 11:07, Marek Haicman wrote:
>>> On 08/03/2017 02:28 AM, Shawn Wells wrote:
 Hey Guys

  Just downloaded the RHEL 7.4 installation media and attempted
 to use the oscap-anaconda features. Selected "security" during the
 installer, and noticed a few things:

 (1) The CUI/NIST 800-171 profile has the description from OSPP:


 (2) There are multiple RHEL7 STIG options:


 I'm not sure how/why this is happening.

 The 800-171 profile does extend OSPP. Do we need a "extends" for
 the profile description field?
 https://github.com/OpenSCAP/scap-security-guide/blob/master/RHEL/7/input/profiles/nist-800-171-cui.xml




 ___
 scap-security-guide mailing list --
 scap-security-guide@lists.fedorahosted.org
 To unsubscribe send an email to
 scap-security-guide-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org

>>> Hey Shawn,
>>> ad (2) this is known issue
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1437106
>>>
>>> For (1) that description is the same that SCAP Workbench displays,
>>> and oscap generates from the guides (as can be seen
>>> http://static.open-scap.org/ssg-guides/ssg-rhel7-guide-index.html).
>>>   Extend concatenates description of extended profile and the
>>> extending one. Is it a bug?
>> This is not a bug.
>> To replace extended description, extending description element should
>> have attribute override="true", like the title element has.
> Well, this is a bug if description of CUI/NIST 800-171 is not expected
> to be appended to description of OSPP Profile. 

IMHO it comes down to the profiles not including "override=true" in the
profile descriptions.

Never knew they were needed. How come we didn't have this problem in
earlier editions of oscap-anaconda? The profiles don't seem to have
override=true in the description field, but in prior RHEL releases
things were OK.

-- 
Shawn Wells
Chief Security Strategist 
North America Public Sector
sh...@redhat.com   |   443-534-0130

___
scap-security-guide mailing list -- scap-security-guide@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to scap-security-guide-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org


Re: RHEL 7.4 oscap-anaconda - profile descriptions

2017-08-03 Thread Watson Yuuma Sato

On 03/08/17 15:36, Watson Yuuma Sato wrote:

On 03/08/17 11:07, Marek Haicman wrote:

On 08/03/2017 02:28 AM, Shawn Wells wrote:

Hey Guys

 Just downloaded the RHEL 7.4 installation media and attempted 
to use the oscap-anaconda features. Selected "security" during the 
installer, and noticed a few things:


(1) The CUI/NIST 800-171 profile has the description from OSPP:


(2) There are multiple RHEL7 STIG options:


I'm not sure how/why this is happening.

The 800-171 profile does extend OSPP. Do we need a "extends" for the 
profile description field?
https://github.com/OpenSCAP/scap-security-guide/blob/master/RHEL/7/input/profiles/nist-800-171-cui.xml 





___
scap-security-guide mailing list -- 
scap-security-guide@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 
scap-security-guide-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org



Hey Shawn,
ad (2) this is known issue 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1437106


For (1) that description is the same that SCAP Workbench displays, 
and oscap generates from the guides (as can be seen 
http://static.open-scap.org/ssg-guides/ssg-rhel7-guide-index.html).
  Extend concatenates description of extended profile and the 
extending one. Is it a bug?

This is not a bug.
To replace extended description, extending description element should 
have attribute override="true", like the title element has.
Well, this is a bug if description of CUI/NIST 800-171 is not expected 
to be appended to description of OSPP Profile.




Marek
___
scap-security-guide mailing list -- 
scap-security-guide@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 
scap-security-guide-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org





--
Watson Sato
Security Technologies | Red Hat, Inc
___
scap-security-guide mailing list -- scap-security-guide@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to scap-security-guide-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org


Re: RHEL 7.4 oscap-anaconda - profile descriptions

2017-08-03 Thread Watson Yuuma Sato

On 03/08/17 11:07, Marek Haicman wrote:

On 08/03/2017 02:28 AM, Shawn Wells wrote:

Hey Guys

 Just downloaded the RHEL 7.4 installation media and attempted to 
use the oscap-anaconda features. Selected "security" during the 
installer, and noticed a few things:


(1) The CUI/NIST 800-171 profile has the description from OSPP:


(2) There are multiple RHEL7 STIG options:


I'm not sure how/why this is happening.

The 800-171 profile does extend OSPP. Do we need a "extends" for the 
profile description field?
https://github.com/OpenSCAP/scap-security-guide/blob/master/RHEL/7/input/profiles/nist-800-171-cui.xml 





___
scap-security-guide mailing list -- 
scap-security-guide@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 
scap-security-guide-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org



Hey Shawn,
ad (2) this is known issue 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1437106


For (1) that description is the same that SCAP Workbench displays, and 
oscap generates from the guides (as can be seen 
http://static.open-scap.org/ssg-guides/ssg-rhel7-guide-index.html).
  Extend concatenates description of extended profile and the 
extending one. Is it a bug?

This is not a bug.
To replace extended description, extending description element should 
have attribute override="true", like the title element has.




Marek
___
scap-security-guide mailing list -- 
scap-security-guide@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 
scap-security-guide-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org



--
Watson Sato
Security Technologies | Red Hat, Inc
___
scap-security-guide mailing list -- scap-security-guide@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to scap-security-guide-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org


Re: RHEL 7.4 oscap-anaconda - profile descriptions

2017-08-03 Thread Marek Haicman

On 08/03/2017 02:28 AM, Shawn Wells wrote:

Hey Guys

 Just downloaded the RHEL 7.4 installation media and attempted to 
use the oscap-anaconda features. Selected "security" during the 
installer, and noticed a few things:


(1) The CUI/NIST 800-171 profile has the description from OSPP:


(2) There are multiple RHEL7 STIG options:


I'm not sure how/why this is happening.

The 800-171 profile does extend OSPP. Do we need a "extends" for the 
profile description field?

https://github.com/OpenSCAP/scap-security-guide/blob/master/RHEL/7/input/profiles/nist-800-171-cui.xml



___
scap-security-guide mailing list -- scap-security-guide@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to scap-security-guide-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org


Hey Shawn,
ad (2) this is known issue 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1437106


For (1) that description is the same that SCAP Workbench displays, and 
oscap generates from the guides (as can be seen 
http://static.open-scap.org/ssg-guides/ssg-rhel7-guide-index.html).
  Extend concatenates description of extended profile and the extending 
one. Is it a bug?


Marek
___
scap-security-guide mailing list -- scap-security-guide@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to scap-security-guide-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org