> I guess yous are talking about position search only...
I'm thinking about all kind of searches inside the move data, but especially
position search is the most important case.
> Maybe the correct answer is that search order is not important to a
> position search. If doing a full search of a ga
I guess yous are talking about position search only, when variations
in a game means it may match more than once.
Maybe the correct answer is that search order is not important to a
position search. If doing a full search of a game and it has multiple
matches, all matches be shown in the results.
> Actually, the depth-based search model was (b), wasn't it? At least that's
> how I read it.
Ok, my fault, this is the currently implemented method.
> But I'd need to see some more high-level concretizations to really grasp
> the difference in practice. What are some likely user scenarios that w
On 22.05.2015 (22:10), Gregor Cramer wrote:
> Ok, you are proposing method (a).
Actually, the depth-based search model was (b), wasn't it? At least that's
how I read it.
But I'd need to see some more high-level concretizations to really grasp
the difference in practice. What are some likely user
Eyolf Østrem wrote:
> With optimal, do you mean computationally or for the user?
Of course, I've meant the optimal search order for the user. From the
computational point of view in this case it makes no significant difference how
to search.
> My hunch is that the depth-based search would be clos
On 22.05.2015 (19:44), Gregor Cramer wrote:
> What is the optimal search order?
With optimal, do you mean computationally or for the user? I.e. how most
efficiently to find the right subset of positions from a huge database, or
how to find the one line or set of lines the user is most likely look
What is the optimal search order? Assume we have the following
game structure:
v.0( m.1 m.2 m.3
v.1.1( m.3.1 m.3.2 m.3.3
v.2.1( m.3.3.1 m.3.3.2 )
m.3.4 )
m.4 m.5
v.1.2( m.5.1 m.5.2
v.2.2( m.5.2.1 m.5.2.2 m.5.2.3 ) )
m.6
Now we have two possibiliti
7 matches
Mail list logo
