> The only reason I still have to use those other Scid derivatives is HEADER
> SEARCH.
I'm developing Scidb since five years - software development is a very, very
time-consuming work - and only since short time I'm reading that some users
like to use Scidb as a full-value chess database. I'm grat
correction: Is there something equivalent in Scidb that I'm missing?
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Michael G Thomas wrote:
> The only reason I still have to use those other Scid derivatives is HEADER
> SEARCH. When will Scidb get this? Is there something equivalent in Scid
> that I'm missing?
2 matches
Mail list logo
