Re: about realtime system

2014-08-27 Thread David Sommerseth
On 24/08/14 18:57, John Lauro wrote: Why spread FUD about Vmware. Anyways, to hear what they say on the subject: http://www.vmware.com/files/pdf/techpaper/latency-sensitive-perf-vsphere55.pdf Anyways, KVM will not handle latency any better than Vmware. You can currently not achieve true

Re: about realtime system

2014-08-27 Thread Michael Duvall
Hello, While I am thoroughly interested in SL topics, I rarely comment on threads. Today is an exception. I work for a real-time linux vendor. I concur with David Somerseth's summation. Real-time cannot be achieved under virtualization. Regards, -- Michael Duvall Systems Analyst, Real-Time

Re: about realtime system

2014-08-27 Thread Ken Teh
I used to play with a realtime Linux system back in the 90s that had a sort of virtualization architecture. It had a realtime executive that could run realtime tasks. One of its tasks was the Linux kernel itself so this way the tasks could talk with linux processes and make use of linux