On 10/12/2018 07:35 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
[snip]
> On SL 7? Why? Is there any reason not to use xfs? I've appreciated the
> ext filesystems, I've known its original author for decades. (He was
> my little brother in my fraternity!) But there's not a compelling
> reason to use it in recent
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 4:50 PM Larry Linder
wrote:
>
> New System:
>
> Gigabyte Mother board.
> 32 G Ram
> 6 core AMD processor.
> ext4 FS ??
On SL 7? Why? Is there any reason not to use xfs? I've appreciated the
ext filesystems, I've known its original author for decades. (He was
my little
And bios sees it, right?
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018, 16:50 Larry Linder
wrote:
> New System:
>
> Gigabyte Mother board.
> 32 G Ram
> 6 core AMD processor.
> ext4 FS ??
>
> Disk:
> 0. SSD 240G sda cibtaubs o/s
> 1. WD 2 TBsdb contains /usr/local & /engr, /engr/users
> 2. WD 2 TB
New System:
Gigabyte Mother board.
32 G Ram
6 core AMD processor.
ext4 FS ??
Disk:
0. SSD 240G sda cibtaubs o/s
1. WD 2 TBsdb contains /usr/local & /engr, /engr/users
2. WD 2 TBsdc contains /mariadb, & company library
3. WD 2 TBsdd contains /backup for
On 09/26/2018 07:51 PM, Yasha Karant wrote:
> the second is an
> external 2 Tbyte USB harddrive with a XFS file system that is a dd copy
> of a partition from another SL 7 machine (that is having difficulties --
> the partition is /home and the data is important).
Wouldn't a dd copy wipe out
