With my conspiracy-theory hat on, I suspect the timing of this
announcement, a week after the demise of the much-loved RHEL6.
--
Andrew C. Aitchison Kendal, UK
and...@aitchison.me.uk
I agree with your sentiments, based upon several informal discussions I
have had with CentOS 8 "adopters". "Supported" RHEL 8 seems to be
better -- but are there still issues with EPEL, etc., because of
inappropriate sub-system designations (as with the python example you
provide)? From what
On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 04:39:32PM -0800, Patrick J. LoPresti wrote:
>
> It has been almost exactly seven years since Red Hat bought CentOS
>
The way I remember it, RedHat approached CentOS lead developers and
made them an offer they could not refuse.
>
> Very curious how CERN and Fermilab will
It has been almost exactly seven years since Red Hat bought CentOS (
is there any possibility for scientific linux 8?
we are testing centos 8 for several monthes, but scientific linux is
much better.
For those who want to be nauseated, here is the essential quote of the post:
The future of the CentOS Project is CentOS Stream, and over the next
year we’ll be shifting focus from CentOS Linux, the rebuild of Red Hat
Enterprise Linux (RHEL), to CentOS Stream, which tracks just ahead of a
Anyone else on the verge of tears after reading today's CentOS blog post?
