Two items of possible interest on OpenRC, with a relevant excerpt therefrom:
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 12:14 AM Benson Muite
wrote:
>
> On 1/24/21 9:37 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 11:26 AM Serguei Mokhov wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 11:00 AM Mark Rousell
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>
> >>> BUT... the fact that SysVInit is seen as
On 1/24/21 9:37 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 11:26 AM Serguei Mokhov wrote:
On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 11:00 AM Mark Rousell wrote:
BUT... the fact that SysVInit is seen as outdated is NOT a reason in and of
itself to support SystemD.
There may have been and, in
On 24/01/2021 18:07, Mark Rousell wrote:
> As for why less bloated (as many would see it) or over-expanded (as
> many would see it) init systems have not been more widely adopted
s/or over-expanded/or not-over-expanded/
On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 11:26 AM Serguei Mokhov wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 11:00 AM Mark Rousell
> wrote:
> >
>
> > BUT... the fact that SysVInit is seen as outdated is NOT a reason in and of
> > itself to support SystemD.
> > There may have been and, in many people's opinion, there
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 9:20 PM Yasha Karant wrote:
>
> I had not heard the history of SystemD in any detail. What, if any,
> were the software engineering and design justifications for SystemD? I
The unreliability of SysV init scripts, especially for dependent
services, and the lack of
Mark Rousell's commentary is accurate and to the point. As for "better
ones" and the lack of competitor systems being "widely adopted" is far
more a for-profit business decision than a decision based upon the
abstract software engineering and performance merits of the situation.
Despite the
On 24/01/2021 16:26, Serguei Mokhov wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 11:00 AM Mark Rousell
> wrote:
>> BUT... the fact that SysVInit is seen as outdated is NOT a reason in and of
>> itself to support SystemD.
>> There may have been and, in many people's opinion, there were and are better
>>
On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 11:00 AM Mark Rousell wrote:
>
> BUT... the fact that SysVInit is seen as outdated is NOT a reason in and of
> itself to support SystemD.
> There may have been and, in many people's opinion, there were and are better
> init systems
> to replace SysVInit than SystemD.
On 24/01/2021 02:52, Lamar Owen wrote:
> Straight SysV init does not meet the needs of many server setups,
> especially server setups that need to dynamically change the daemon
> mix that is currently running. Virtualization hosts, software-defined
> networking setups, and what is typically
10 matches
Mail list logo
