For your system, I would not agonize over choice of ext4 or XFS,
in practice you will see little difference.
Some practical advice for your system:
- bump the OS + home dirs from 1TB to 2TB (incremental cost of two 1TB SSD vs
two 2TB SSD is small)
- run this system on UPS power. your 200 TB
On Wed, 2023-12-06 at 09:18 -0500, Edward Zuniga wrote:
Thanks everyone for the feedback! I've learned so much from reading the
discussions.
For our application, we will have a LAN with a single server (1TB RAID1 array
for OS, 200TB RAID5 array for data) and up to 16 workstations (1TB RAID1
We've never had any problems - these or any of the others mentioned. We've used
XFS on single HDD and SSD physical workstations, but have since migrated those
to VMs, so they're on hardware RAID now, as are most of our systems - whether
VM or bare metal. Since we've not encountered a corrupt
Cc'ing supervisor to loop him in as well.
On Wed, Dec 6, 2023, 9:18 AM Edward Zuniga wrote:
> Thanks everyone for the feedback! I've learned so much from reading the
> discussions.
>
> For our application, we will have a LAN with a single server (1TB RAID1
> array for OS, 200TB RAID5 array for
Thanks everyone for the feedback! I've learned so much from reading the
discussions.
For our application, we will have a LAN with a single server (1TB RAID1
array for OS, 200TB RAID5 array for data) and up to 16 workstations (1TB
RAID1 array for OS). Our IT department is more familiar with Rocky
