UNSUBSCRIBE

UNSUBSCRIBE Den 2017-12-06 15:56 skrev "Pat Riehecky" följande: Synopsis: Important: java-1.7.0-openjdk security and bug fix update Advisory ID: SLSA-2017:3392-1 Issue Date:2017-12-06 CVE Numbers: CVE-2017-10193

Re: Sagemath

On Wed, 2017-05-03 at 14:30 -0700, Yasha Karant wrote: > Sagemath is an open source licensed-for-free alternative to > Mathematica,  > Maple, and other proprietary applications.  Has anyone compiled  -- > or  > found an installation, not source, RPM for -- Sagemath for SL7? Hi, There are still a

Re: gramps for Sl 7?

ORA-EPEL-2017-bab2492ce9 It should show up in the repo after one or two weeks (can't remember which) or if it reaches 3 karma points on that last link. Regards, Benjamin Lefoul ("lef")

Re: gramps for Sl 7?

quire bsddb3. Any help, > or pointers to good altenatives, would be welcome. The package is not yet built for EPEL7. I have just requested the branch and if it's not too challenging I will build it. I will inform here when / if it's available, Cheers, Benjamin Lefoul (FAS: lef)

Re: I would like to join SL

On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 16:31 -0600, Uriel Gonzalez wrote: > Hello, Hi, > I am a mathematics/computer science college student. I am looking > forward to becoming a SL user, but the last time that I installed it > it came with the Red Hat Enterprise Linux License Agreement. I > remember the

Re: pam_mount

On Thu, 2016-07-21 at 15:19 +0200, Lars Behrens wrote: > Hi there, > > I am new to SL and this list, so I am not sure wether this is the > right > place to ask: > > I just wanted to set up ldap-authentication with kerberos and > pam_mount > of some cifs-Shares. Authentication works fine. But for

Is a mirror what I want?

opy of SL7 and in which respective context... Thanks! Benjamin Lefoul nWISE AB

RE: Filesystem package messes with /usr/local

tories, are required in /usr. Directory Description bin Most user commands lib Libraries local Local hierarchy (empty after main installation) sbinNon-vital system binaries share Architecture-independent data Benjamin Lefoul From:

RE: Filesystem package messes with /usr/local

, here is a link to the same section of version 3.0: http://refspecs.linuxfoundation.org/FHS_3.0/fhs/ch04s09.html Benjamin Lefoul From: owner-scientific-linux-us...@listserv.fnal.gov [owner-scientific-linux-us...@listserv.fnal.gov] On Behalf Of Nico Kadel

RE: BTRFS

lt, and I don't know if that means SLES (a major enterprise distro) also considers BTRFS mature. If you recommend not using BTRFS in Scientific Linux until Red Hat makes a major release of it, that could mean 3 years of waiting given their release life cycle. I am no longer sure which way to go… Benj

RE: BTRFS

Thank you all for your input and links! I does sound like mdadm and LVM are still safer. Transparent data compression will have to wait a few years, but at least the future looks promising. Regards, Benjamin Lefoul nWISE AB From: David Sommerseth [sl+us