On 12/17/2014 11:27 PM, Mark Stodola wrote:
On 12/17/2014 04:25 PM, Fernando Andrés Muñoz Bravo wrote:
I mean, if SL will become a CentOS variant or not.
I think the answer to that is no. The SL team made a decision to
continue to spin their own independent set of packages and not become
Le 17/12/2014 23:27, Mark Stodola a écrit :
I think the answer to that is no. The SL team made a decision to
continue to spin their own independent set of packages and not become
an add-on repository to the CentOS build.
Someone please correct me if I am wrong...
Yes, but the RHEL source
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 7:44 AM, Alain Péan alain.p...@lpn.cnrs.fr wrote:
Le 17/12/2014 23:27, Mark Stodola a écrit :
I think the answer to that is no. The SL team made a decision to continue
to spin their own independent set of packages and not become an add-on
repository to the CentOS
Hi guys...
What about CentOS variant for SL?... Still planning, or this kind of
merging will not apply?
--
Fernando Andrés Muñoz Bravo
*Tg.* Análisis y Desarollo de Sistemas de Información
Linux user #487547
I mean, if SL will become a CentOS variant or not.
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 5:18 PM, Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 17 December 2014 at 14:49, Fernando Andrés Muñoz Bravo
wasp...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys...
What about CentOS variant for SL?... Still planning, or this
--use-the-force-luke
On Dec 17, 2014 5:18 PM, Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17 December 2014 at 14:49, Fernando Andrés Muñoz Bravo
wasp...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys...
What about CentOS variant for SL?... Still planning, or this kind of
merging will not apply?
I
On 12/17/2014 04:25 PM, Fernando Andrés Muñoz Bravo wrote:
I mean, if SL will become a CentOS variant or not.
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 5:18 PM, Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com
mailto:smo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17 December 2014 at 14:49, Fernando Andrés Muñoz Bravo
