Re: VMware

2015-10-31 Thread Vladimir Mosgalin
Hi Yasha Karant! On 2015.10.30 at 08:51:52 -0700, Yasha Karant wrote next: > The physical 802.11 WNIC is IP configured by DHCP from the ISP. Does this > require DHCP "trickery" to transfer this information > to the virtual 802.3 NIC under VirtualBox that is supplied to the MS Win > guest? In

Re: VMware

2015-10-31 Thread Tom H
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 12:11 PM, Vladimir Mosgalin wrote: > On 2015.10.29 at 03:24:37 -0400, Tom H wrote next: >> >> You cannot bridge a wireless NIC: >> >>

Re: VMware

2015-10-30 Thread Vladimir Mosgalin
Hi Yasha Karant! On 2015.10.29 at 13:28:21 -0700, Yasha Karant wrote next: > You seem to display a bridge between an 802.3 (eth) and an 802.11 (wnic). Right. Note that I only did that for purposes of software AP. This is router which provides both wired and wireless network connectivity,

Re: VMware

2015-10-30 Thread Yasha Karant
Hi Vladimir, The physical 802.11 WNIC is IP configured by DHCP from the ISP. Does this require DHCP "trickery" to transfer this information to the virtual 802.3 NIC under VirtualBox that is supplied to the MS Win guest? Yasha Karant On 10/30/2015 08:27 AM, Vladimir Mosgalin wrote: Hi Yasha

Re: VMware

2015-10-29 Thread Vladimir Mosgalin
story. Or just outdated, as it was written in the 2009. > > There are web sites that show how to get around this limitation via > either ebtables or proxy-arp. I've never tried either but I assume > that, since VirtualBox and VMware allow it, they must use a similar > workaround

Re: VMware

2015-10-29 Thread Lamar Owen
On 10/29/2015 01:45 AM, prmari...@gmail.com wrote: If you have slow video performance on KVM look into spice. Which is not included with SL but it's not hard to add. It is included in the repos; I consider being in the repos to be included with SL. Spice makes things really nice.

Re: VMware

2015-10-29 Thread Yasha Karant
t outdated, as it was written in the 2009. There are web sites that show how to get around this limitation via either ebtables or proxy-arp. I've never tried either but I assume that, since VirtualBox and VMware allow it, they must use a similar workaround under the cover. I launch VMs with "qem

Re: VMware

2015-10-29 Thread Tom H
tual machine under SL. That is, this solution is not the > same "in spirit" as is VirtualBox. On a hard 802.3 wired connection, > VirtualBox does provide Internet access to the outside world from the guest; > this seems to be a failure on a 802.11 ISP wifi connection. JHas anyon

Re: VMware

2015-10-29 Thread Francesco M. Taurino
hi, yes, the wlan card seems fully connected. in virtualbox 4 or 5, when you create a virtual machine, in the network settings panel, select the bridge mode and the physical nic you want to use, like in this screenshot: http://i.imgur.com/FYr4BZs.png (in italian, but clear I hope...) it

Re: VMware

2015-10-28 Thread Francesco M. Taurino
hi yasha, kvm windows 7/8/10 guests can be a bit slow in graphic applications, but quite usable if you need cpu/memory raw power. you can use virtualbox, and bridge the virtual lan card of your guest to a physical lan or a wifi adapter. the wifi adapter must be fully connected on your linux

Re: VMware

2015-10-28 Thread prmarino1
is to do NAT.   Original Message   From: Francesco M. Taurino Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2015 03:54 To: SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@fnal.gov Subject: Re: VMware hi yasha, kvm windows 7/8/10 guests can be a bit slow in graphic applications, but quite usable if you need cpu/memory raw power. you can

Re: VMware

2015-10-28 Thread Yasha Karant
Hi Francesco, I just installed VirtualBox-5.0-5.0.6_103037_el7-1.x86_64.rpm along with Oracle_VM_VirtualBox_Extension_Pack-5.0.6-103037.vbox-extpack and the MS Win tools package of the above VirtualBox release to no avail. What do you mean by "wifi adapter must be fully connected on your

Re: VMware

2015-10-27 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
nux host "forum" without > a reply -- evidently, this is a problem with the current VirtualBox for > which no one has a viable solution -- hence my interest in VMware Player. The number of people gawking at a traffic accident is not an indicator that the accident was caused by a manufacturer conspiracy.

Re: VMware

2015-10-27 Thread Karel Lang AFD
without a reply -- evidently, this is a problem with the current VirtualBox for which no one has a viable solution -- hence my interest in VMware Player. The number of people gawking at a traffic accident is not an indicator that the accident was caused by a manufacturer conspiracy.

Re: VMware

2015-10-26 Thread Akemi Yagi
tual machine under SL. That is, this solution is not the > same "in spirit" as is VirtualBox. On a hard 802.3 wired connection, > VirtualBox does provide Internet access to the outside world from the guest; > this seems to be a failure on a 802.11 ISP wifi connection. JHas anyon

Re: VMware

2015-10-26 Thread Lamar Owen
tually try it yourself? On a hard 802.3 wired connection, VirtualBox does provide Internet access to the outside world from the guest; this seems to be a failure on a 802.11 ISP wifi connection. JHas anyone used VMware-Player-12.0.0-2985596.x86_64.bundle on a SL7 host with a MS Win guest? VMware-

Re: VMware

2015-10-26 Thread Yasha Karant
seems to be a failure on a 802.11 ISP wifi connection. JHas anyone used VMware-Player-12.0.0-2985596 .x86_64.bundle on a SL7 host with a MS Win guest? Did you really enabled bridged interface for host on VirtualBox? -- Eero Yes -- I just tried it again. The only network t

Re: VMware

2015-10-26 Thread Eero Volotinen
ws as an application >> environment virtual machine under SL. That is, this solution is not the >> same "in spirit" as is VirtualBox. On a hard 802.3 wired connection, >> VirtualBox does provide Internet access to the outside world from the >> guest; this seem

VMware

2015-10-26 Thread Yasha Karant
VirtualBox. On a hard 802.3 wired connection, VirtualBox does provide Internet access to the outside world from the guest; this seems to be a failure on a 802.11 ISP wifi connection. JHas anyone used VMware-Player-12.0.0-2985596.x86_64.bundle on a SL7 host with a MS Win guest? If so, is the &quo

What is all this AMQP stuff anyhow? Boot Log: Starting VMware AMQP Service: [failed

2014-02-28 Thread dg
Dear list, SL6.5, home usage and use VMware Player for the crash test dummies. Should one ignore it? Turn a blind eye - born with one of those so already pre-equipped. Oh well back to cleansing of spectacles, some julialang.org, some learning, meditation, bit of electronic engineering, morning

Re: What is all this AMQP stuff anyhow? Boot Log: Starting VMware AMQP Service: [failed

2014-02-28 Thread Mark Stodola
Bill -Original message- From:dggre...@virginmedia.com Sent: Saturday 1st March 2014 11:51 To: scientific-linux-users@fnal.gov Subject: What is all this AMQP stuff anyhow? Boot Log:quot;Starting VMware AMQP Service: [failedquot; Dear list, SL6.5, home usage and use VMware Player

Re: About the time sync for linux guest under vmware of windows xp host

2013-09-02 Thread David Sommerseth
On 01/09/13 16:05, TAO Zhijiang wrote: 于 2013-9-1 21:35, Akemi Yagi 写道: On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 6:26 AM, Paul Robert Marino prmari...@gmail.com wrote: Also you should always use VMware tools to sync your time instead of NTP on VMware virtual machines. VMWare hypervisor plays games

Re: About the time sync for linux guest under vmware of windows xp host

2013-09-02 Thread taozhijiang
OK, I just found the problem. It is my local host windows xp firewall, which blocked the communicate between the host and guest. disabled the windows's firewall, all goes well! [user@workstation ~]$ ntpdate -d 192.168.17.1 2 Sep 21:02:18 ntpdate[1243]: ntpdate 4.2.4p8@1.1612-o Fri Feb 22

Re: About the time sync for linux guest under vmware of windows xp host

2013-09-02 Thread Adam Bishop
On 1 Sep 2013, at 15:05, TAO Zhijiang taozhiji...@gmail.com wrote: I will frequently change my kernel, so everytime I may reinstall the vmware-tools, which will really make me mad. How extensive are the changes? If they're minor, you should be able to use these (make sure I guessed

Re: About the time sync for linux guest under vmware of windows xp host

2013-09-01 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 5:43 AM, taozhijiang taozhiji...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I just install my SL carbon 6.4 under vmware environment for kernel study, but found the system time runs much faster than the host. I want the kernel to be pure, so I do not take account of vmware-tools. I setup

Re: About the time sync for linux guest under vmware of windows xp host

2013-09-01 Thread Paul Robert Marino
It sounds like your network on the VMware side isn't configured correctly.Also you should always use VMware tools to sync your time instead of NTP on VMware virtual machines.VMWare hypervisor plays games with the clock on purpose and can cause a VM with NTP enabled to behave erratically.-- Sent

Re: About the time sync for linux guest under vmware of windows xp host

2013-09-01 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 6:26 AM, Paul Robert Marino prmari...@gmail.com wrote: Also you should always use VMware tools to sync your time instead of NTP on VMware virtual machines. VMWare hypervisor plays games with the clock on purpose and can cause a VM with NTP enabled to behave erratically

Re: About the time sync for linux guest under vmware of windows xp host

2013-09-01 Thread TAO Zhijiang
于 2013-9-1 21:35, Akemi Yagi 写道: On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 6:26 AM, Paul Robert Marino prmari...@gmail.com wrote: Also you should always use VMware tools to sync your time instead of NTP on VMware virtual machines. VMWare hypervisor plays games with the clock on purpose and can cause a VM