Hi Yasha Karant!
On 2015.10.30 at 08:51:52 -0700, Yasha Karant wrote next:
> The physical 802.11 WNIC is IP configured by DHCP from the ISP. Does this
> require DHCP "trickery" to transfer this information
> to the virtual 802.3 NIC under VirtualBox that is supplied to the MS Win
> guest?
In
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 12:11 PM, Vladimir Mosgalin
wrote:
> On 2015.10.29 at 03:24:37 -0400, Tom H wrote next:
>>
>> You cannot bridge a wireless NIC:
>>
>>
Hi Yasha Karant!
On 2015.10.29 at 13:28:21 -0700, Yasha Karant wrote next:
> You seem to display a bridge between an 802.3 (eth) and an 802.11 (wnic).
Right.
Note that I only did that for purposes of software AP. This is router
which provides both wired and wireless network connectivity,
Hi Vladimir,
The physical 802.11 WNIC is IP configured by DHCP from the ISP. Does
this require DHCP "trickery" to transfer this information
to the virtual 802.3 NIC under VirtualBox that is supplied to the MS Win
guest?
Yasha Karant
On 10/30/2015 08:27 AM, Vladimir Mosgalin wrote:
Hi Yasha
story. Or just outdated, as it was written in the 2009.
>
> There are web sites that show how to get around this limitation via
> either ebtables or proxy-arp. I've never tried either but I assume
> that, since VirtualBox and VMware allow it, they must use a similar
> workaround
On 10/29/2015 01:45 AM, prmari...@gmail.com wrote:
If you have slow video performance on KVM look into spice. Which is not
included with SL but it's not hard to add.
It is included in the repos; I consider being in the repos to be
included with SL. Spice makes things really nice.
t outdated, as it was written in the 2009.
There are web sites that show how to get around this limitation via
either ebtables or proxy-arp. I've never tried either but I assume
that, since VirtualBox and VMware allow it, they must use a similar
workaround under the cover.
I launch VMs with "qem
tual machine under SL. That is, this solution is not the
> same "in spirit" as is VirtualBox. On a hard 802.3 wired connection,
> VirtualBox does provide Internet access to the outside world from the guest;
> this seems to be a failure on a 802.11 ISP wifi connection. JHas anyon
hi,
yes, the wlan card seems fully connected.
in virtualbox 4 or 5, when you create a virtual machine,
in the network settings panel, select the bridge mode and
the physical nic you want to use, like in this screenshot:
http://i.imgur.com/FYr4BZs.png
(in italian, but clear I hope...)
it
hi yasha,
kvm windows 7/8/10 guests can be a bit slow in graphic applications, but
quite usable
if you need cpu/memory raw power.
you can use virtualbox, and bridge the virtual lan card of your guest to
a physical lan
or a wifi adapter. the wifi adapter must be fully connected on your
linux
is to do NAT.
Original Message
From: Francesco M. Taurino
Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2015 03:54
To: SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@fnal.gov
Subject: Re: VMware
hi yasha,
kvm windows 7/8/10 guests can be a bit slow in graphic applications, but
quite usable
if you need cpu/memory raw power.
you can
Hi Francesco,
I just installed VirtualBox-5.0-5.0.6_103037_el7-1.x86_64.rpm along with
Oracle_VM_VirtualBox_Extension_Pack-5.0.6-103037.vbox-extpack
and the MS Win tools package of the above VirtualBox release to no avail.
What do you mean by "wifi adapter must be fully connected on your
nux host "forum" without
> a reply -- evidently, this is a problem with the current VirtualBox for
> which no one has a viable solution -- hence my interest in VMware Player.
The number of people gawking at a traffic accident is not an indicator
that the accident was caused by a manufacturer conspiracy.
without
a reply -- evidently, this is a problem with the current VirtualBox for
which no one has a viable solution -- hence my interest in VMware Player.
The number of people gawking at a traffic accident is not an indicator
that the accident was caused by a manufacturer conspiracy.
tual machine under SL. That is, this solution is not the
> same "in spirit" as is VirtualBox. On a hard 802.3 wired connection,
> VirtualBox does provide Internet access to the outside world from the guest;
> this seems to be a failure on a 802.11 ISP wifi connection. JHas anyon
tually try it yourself?
On a hard 802.3 wired connection, VirtualBox does provide Internet
access to the outside world from the guest; this seems to be a failure
on a 802.11 ISP wifi connection. JHas anyone used
VMware-Player-12.0.0-2985596.x86_64.bundle on a SL7 host with a MS Win
guest?
VMware-
seems to be a failure on a
802.11 ISP wifi connection. JHas anyone used
VMware-Player-12.0.0-2985596 .x86_64.bundle on a
SL7 host with a MS Win guest?
Did you really enabled bridged interface for host on VirtualBox?
--
Eero
Yes -- I just tried it again. The only network t
ws as an application
>> environment virtual machine under SL. That is, this solution is not the
>> same "in spirit" as is VirtualBox. On a hard 802.3 wired connection,
>> VirtualBox does provide Internet access to the outside world from the
>> guest; this seem
VirtualBox. On a hard 802.3 wired connection,
VirtualBox does provide Internet access to the outside world from the
guest; this seems to be a failure on a 802.11 ISP wifi connection. JHas
anyone used VMware-Player-12.0.0-2985596.x86_64.bundle on a SL7 host
with a MS Win guest?
If so, is the &quo
Dear list,
SL6.5, home usage and use VMware Player for the crash test dummies.
Should one ignore it?
Turn a blind eye - born with one of those so already pre-equipped.
Oh well back to cleansing of spectacles, some julialang.org, some learning,
meditation, bit of electronic engineering, morning
Bill
-Original message-
From:dggre...@virginmedia.com
Sent: Saturday 1st March 2014 11:51
To: scientific-linux-users@fnal.gov
Subject: What is all this AMQP stuff anyhow? Boot Log:quot;Starting VMware AMQP
Service: [failedquot;
Dear list,
SL6.5, home usage and use VMware Player
On 01/09/13 16:05, TAO Zhijiang wrote:
于 2013-9-1 21:35, Akemi Yagi 写道:
On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 6:26 AM, Paul Robert Marino
prmari...@gmail.com wrote:
Also you should always use VMware tools to sync your time instead of
NTP on
VMware virtual machines.
VMWare hypervisor plays games
OK, I just found the problem.
It is my local host windows xp firewall, which blocked the communicate
between the host and guest.
disabled the windows's firewall, all goes well!
[user@workstation ~]$ ntpdate -d 192.168.17.1
2 Sep 21:02:18 ntpdate[1243]: ntpdate 4.2.4p8@1.1612-o Fri Feb 22
On 1 Sep 2013, at 15:05, TAO Zhijiang taozhiji...@gmail.com wrote:
I will frequently change my kernel, so everytime I may reinstall the
vmware-tools, which will
really make me mad.
How extensive are the changes? If they're minor, you should be able to use
these (make sure I guessed
On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 5:43 AM, taozhijiang taozhiji...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello, I just install my SL carbon 6.4 under vmware environment for
kernel study, but found the system time runs much faster than the host.
I want the kernel to be pure, so I do not take account of vmware-tools.
I setup
It sounds like your network on the VMware side isn't configured correctly.Also you should always use VMware tools to sync your time instead of NTP on VMware virtual machines.VMWare hypervisor plays games with the clock on purpose and can cause a VM with NTP enabled to behave erratically.-- Sent
On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 6:26 AM, Paul Robert Marino prmari...@gmail.com wrote:
Also you should always use VMware tools to sync your time instead of NTP on
VMware virtual machines.
VMWare hypervisor plays games with the clock on purpose and can cause a VM
with NTP enabled to behave erratically
于 2013-9-1 21:35, Akemi Yagi 写道:
On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 6:26 AM, Paul Robert Marino prmari...@gmail.com wrote:
Also you should always use VMware tools to sync your time instead of NTP on
VMware virtual machines.
VMWare hypervisor plays games with the clock on purpose and can cause a VM
28 matches
Mail list logo