On 18/12/14 20:16, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 04:51:19PM -0800, Keith Lofstrom wrote:
>> Again - the reason for 32 bit is not that I cherish old CPUs ...
>> And that is why I ask here; if anybody runs old machines for
>> compatibility reasons, it would be experimental sci
- Original Message -
> From: Dag Wieers
> To: Connie Sieh
> Cc: SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
> Sent: Friday, 16 May 2014, 17:03
> Subject: Re: Any 7 rumors?
>
> On Thu, 15 May 2014, Connie Sieh wrote:
>
>
>> On Thu, 15 May 2014, Dag Wieers wrote:
>>> On Tue, 8 Apr 20
>> FUD
>>
>
> F = fear
> U = uncertainty
> D = deception
>
> what did I say that qualifies? There is no "S" there for
> "stupid" or "O" for "obvious".
>
Erm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fear,_uncertainty_and_doubt
> Yeah, I did. I'm bouncing around mal clients and browsers lately.
> (Working with a hot new MacBook., got some virtualized Linux OS's on
> it, inlcuding Scientific Linux.)
>
Np, I did it myself earlier.
> Even if it's the point you meant, it's not the point you made. Our
> upstream vendor,
> to myself in private. Do *not* send it to this mailing list unless your
> message is specifically about Scientific Linux. Please do not start a
Firstly, I don't really like being told where I can and can't post. If the
discussion is off-topic, then so is the topic IMHO.
Anyway, I don't real
- Original Message -
> From:Troy Dawson
> To:scientific-linux-users
> Cc:
> Sent:Thursday, 31 March 2011, 21:08
> Subject:Re: New Members of the SL Development Team
>
> Hello,
> There are two new members of the Scientific Linux Development Team. They are
> Jason Harrington and Tyler
Hi,
A case of RTFM. Sorry and thanks.
It's quite odd because Fedora 14 still has support... I think this steered me
in
the wrong direction.
Thanks again,
Ian.
- Original Message
> From: Troy Dawson
> To: Ian Murray
> Cc: "SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@listserv.fnal.
Hi All,
Is the above a bug or has support been dropped?
Thanks in advance,
Ian.
If you happen to be near Coventry in the UK on Tuesday evening, the local Linux
User Group is having a data recovery specialist/police forensics consultant do
a presentation on recovery techniques, using Linux.
Email me off list for details.
Regards,
Ian
>
>From: William Shu
>To: ws...@
Is this issue only exploitable locally, or can it be done remotely?
Thanks
- Original Message
> From: Urs Beyerle
> To: Stephan Wiesand
> Cc: Dr Andrew C Aitchison ;
> "scientific-linux-us...@fnal.gov" ; Gasser
> Marc
> Sent: Friday, 14 August, 2009 14:00:13
> Subject: Re: kernel
find any. My complication is that I use Xen 3.3.1 from the
gitco.de repository.
Thanks for the information,
Ian.
From: Troy Dawson
To: Ian Murray
Cc: "scientific-linux-us...@fnal.gov"
Sent: Tuesday, 11 August, 2009 17:03:24
Subject: Re: Security U
re the same. ;o)
Thanks for the responses,
Ian.
From: Akemi Yagi
To: Ian Murray
Cc: Dr Andrew C Aitchison ;
scientific-linux-us...@fnal.gov
Sent: Tuesday, 11 August, 2009 15:59:27
Subject: Re: Security Updates Question
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 2:12 AM, Ian Mur
t.
I am quite happy to wait a few days for a security updates, but I do take issue
to an unknown exposure where security updates are delayed for an unspecified
length of time.
So, does SL work the same way?
Thanks again.
________
From: Dr Andrew C Aitchison
To: Ian Mur
Hi,
I'm new to the list so please be gentle with me!
I am a user of another well known Redhat Rebuild distribution and it has come
to light that the maintainers don't/can't release interim security updates
while they are rebuilding a new dot release from upstream, as far as I can
understand. T
14 matches
Mail list logo
