I sometimes need to use gfortran compiler switch -std=legacy for some older
codes. Jim.
On 05/11/2011, at 3:57 PM, John Schaad wrote:
> FORTRAN -- For many years I have helped support, have used, and continue to
> use a package of software written mostly in FORTRAN for a DEC VAX Mainframe
>
I ought not have singled out ifort - there are plenty of good commercial
fortran compilers...
On 31/10/2011, at 9:11 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 10:05 PM, James E. Davies
> wrote:
>> gfortran is now very good:
>>
>> gcc-gfortran.x86_64 : F
gfortran is now very good:
gcc-gfortran.x86_64 : Fortran support
if you want to spend money, ifort (Intel fortran) is what we use at work.
gfortran will compile legacy f77 code, as well as f90 and f95 (and f2003?).
cheers,
jim.
On 31/10/2011, at 8:58 PM, Todd And Margo Chester wrote:
> Hi
I just installed SL6.1 "Basic Server" - figured I'd yum install the other stuff
I wanted later. I typically connect via ssh to this box, I do not want or need
a desktop / window manager but I would like to ssh -X and be able to run
programs that generate X output. So I installed the X server
How about Fortran vs C? Python vs Perl? Chicken vs Beef? Alien vs Predator?
Genuine Help-seekers vs Deliberate Time-wasters?
On 02/07/2011, at 11:38 PM, Timmy Siu wrote:
> Hi Friends,
> How do you rate Maxima and SciLab? Both are open source. :-\
>
> Faithfully,
> Timmy
>
>
>> Advice to m
Can somebody provide some advice - or point me to some reading - on the
following topic?
I'd like to start distributing some software as a Linux virtual appliance that
can be easily and freely installed by Win & Mac (as well as Linux) users. Some
of this code can (in principle) be GPU accelera
First post - please tell me if this is not what list is intended for...
I installed CentOS5.6 - but I have a minor problem using usb stick as root dir
- so was going to wait for CentOS6 and re-install differently.
In the interim I found SL, which I did not know about.
If anyone has the time, pl
