Hi Pat
The openafs mailling list says the openafs release fixing
those CVE's is v 1.6.15.
The packages listed in the errata state 1.6.14. SL6/7
Do the SL packages not track the openafs release numbers ?
Thanks
Sean
RAID0: LOL. If I suggested using RAID0, even on a simple dev box, I'd
either be asked to clear my desk on the spot or my name would rise
immediately to #1 on the headcount-reduction list...
That is supposed to be RAID1, I think Konstantin has a buggy keyboard
as well ;-)
Cheers
Sean
On 09/04/2012 09:21 PM, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
On Sun, Sep 02, 2012 at 05:33:24PM -0700, Todd And Margo Chester wrote:
Cherryville drives have a 1.2 million hour MTBF (mean time
between failure) and a 5 year warranty.
Note that MTBF of 1.2 Mhrs (137 years?!?) is the *vendor's
On 04/05/2011 12:02 PM, Rupert Kolb wrote:
Hi,
where is the 389 Directory Server for Scientific 6?
389-ds-base will be going into RHEL 6 at some point. We cannot put it in EPEL6
because it would conflict. We are interested in suggestions about how to provide binary
packages on EL6.
