Hi-
Sorry for such a simple question; couldn't find the answer through search:
How do you launch the Users Groups GUI from the command line?
(I need it for some remote management-- doing what I need to do directly
via the command line is too tedious.)
Thanks,
Wil
Hi-
I am totally stumped and at a complete loss on this one.
In an 'old school' manner (a.k.a poor man's grid engine), it is a common
practice (at least for me) to open multiple terminal windows on a
mullti-core machine. Submitting a job in each terminal window will send it
to a core which is
Thanks for all of the suggestions.
To recap:
1. I'm not sure why my claim that running jobs in several terminal windows
will automatically be distributed to the next least used core (and it
will run at 100% until the job is done. I have be doing this for years w/o
ANY special coding or using any
?
Steve Timm
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012, Wil Irwin wrote:
Hi-
It is 64-bit on 64-bit. The exact version is from
'ge-6.2-bin-lx24-amd64.tar.gz' and 'ge-6.2-common.tar.gz'. So I can rule
out that issue.
As for the problems, I can provide more detail, but in brief (sort of):
1. The installation
Hello-
I am having unparalleled (no pun intended) problems getting SGE 6.2 to run
under SL 6.1. I have consulted with others who have quite a bit of
experience using SGE on an earlier version of SL, and we cannot determine
why it won't run.
Before I list the nature of the problems, I though I
system?
In the case #1, you should be able to get SGE to run once you install
the necessary 32 bit compatibility libraries, or (recommended) switch
to a 64 bit version of SGE 6.2.
In the case #2, you are going to be out of luck...
-Keith.
At 12:43 PM -0800 1/11/12, Wil Irwin wrote:
Hello
, Wil Irwin wrote:
Hi-
It is 64-bit on 64-bit. The exact version is from
'ge-6.2-bin-lx24-amd64.tar.gz' and 'ge-6.2-common.tar.gz'. So I can rule
out that issue.
As for the problems, I can provide more detail, but in brief (sort of):
1. The installation is w/o incident and I have used all
Hi Alex-
While I am not committed to the ATI proprietary drivers, I have been forced
to use them for a number of reasons.
If you haven't noticed, since March, every month (if not more frequently),
ATI releases an update as a rule. It is an unnecessary and very
time-consuming effort. Other than
the Elrepo pages
for documentation of late, but several months ago it was deficient and, to
some degree, misleading.
-Wil
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Phil Perry p...@pendre.co.uk wrote:
On 11/10/11 19:04, Wil Irwin wrote:
Hi Alex-
While I am not committed to the ATI proprietary drivers, I
Hi Phil-
My intent was not to create frustration. Below I have pasted the most
relevant excerpt from our exchange several months ago. After that exchange,
and some success with the ATI drivers, I had to move on to new projects.
Regards,
Wil
---
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 1:12 AM, Wil Irwin wil.ir
forthcoming.
Best regards,
Wil
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Phil Perry p...@pendre.co.uk wrote:
On 16/03/11 20:02, Wil Irwin wrote:
Hi Phil-
I VERY much appreciate your suggestion and help. Sadly, these repo options
didn't solve my problem.
Hmm :-(
Everything installed correctly (i.e
fought
with display adaptor installations endlessly. Probably one of the most
frustrating aspect of getting a new system up and running.
Thanks again for any further guidance you can provide.
Regards,
Wil
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Phil Perry p...@pendre.co.uk wrote:
On 10/03/11 17:28, Wil
12 matches
Mail list logo
