On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote:
Hi,
On 07/11/2012 03:44 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
I'm perhaps being unclear, An announcemenbt that goes out at the same
time as the release itself is not helpful. They've selected as a
Mirrors know about the
On Friday, July 20, 2012 08:27:05 AM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
That's why I'm calling it an unannounced release. The lack of
tentative release dates for CentOS has been only one of the reasons,
for me at least, to use Scientific Linux instead wherever possible. It
was a big problem with the 6.0
Hi,
On 07/11/2012 03:44 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
I'm perhaps being unclear, An announcemenbt that goes out at the same
time as the release itself is not helpful. They've selected as a
Mirrors know about the upcoming release well in advance - remember that
we seed in excess of 1200 external
On 07/11/2012 02:01 AM, Steven Haigh wrote:
Sure, CentOS do things differently. If it compiles, ship it.
erm. No. Thats not how CentOS does it.
SL will more than likely do a Beta, RC, then release - just like they
have with each other point release.
Would love to see this testing
On 18/07/12 13:36, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 07/11/2012 02:01 AM, Steven Haigh wrote:
Sure, CentOS do things differently. If it compiles, ship it.
erm. No. Thats not how CentOS does it.
SL will more than likely do a Beta, RC, then release - just like they
have with each other point release.
On 07/18/2012 09:36 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 07/11/2012 02:01 AM, Steven Haigh wrote:
Sure, CentOS do things differently. If it compiles, ship it.
erm. No. Thats not how CentOS does it.
SL will more than likely do a Beta, RC, then release - just like they
have with each other point
On 07/18/2012 01:58 PM, James Holland wrote:
Would love to see this testing process/code documented somewhere and
what the implications are. So we might be able to better and improve the
process in CentOS as well.
Is there a place where you document the CentOS processes?
we are starting
Hey!
On 07/18/2012 02:00 PM, zxq9 wrote:
I'm sure Connie or Pat would be the people to ask about the QA process
and probably happy to discuss is -- the site/wiki isn't always the focus
at SL, it seems (forums aside, I think a lot of us here read/edit your
wiki over at CentOS for non-dev
On 18/07/12 14:24, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 07/18/2012 01:58 PM, James Holland wrote:
Would love to see this testing process/code documented somewhere and
what the implications are. So we might be able to better and improve the
process in CentOS as well.
Is there a place where you document
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 06:54:59AM +0100, Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jul 2012, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
Yawn. My favourite bug (6.2 ypserv does not respond to NIS broadcasts,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829475)
did not make 6.3, got pushed to 6.4.
You
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
Yawn. My favourite bug (6.2 ypserv does not respond to NIS broadcasts,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829475)
did not make 6.3, got pushed to 6.4.
You are not authorized to access bug #829475.
Can you tell us more ?
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 08:49:29PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
A particular client's mirror of CentOS exploded today with the
unannounced CentOS 6.3 release. Congratulations to them for such quick
work: is there a nominal release date for SL 6.3, so I can make sure
to allocate disk space?
On Wed, 11 Jul 2012, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
Yawn. My favourite bug (6.2 ypserv does not respond to NIS broadcasts,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829475)
did not make 6.3, got pushed to 6.4.
You are not authorized to access bug #829475.
Can you tell us more ?
--
Dr.
A particular client's mirror of CentOS exploded today with the
unannounced CentOS 6.3 release. Congratulations to them for such quick
work: is there a nominal release date for SL 6.3, so I can make sure
to allocate disk space?
I've actually got a mock setup, running SL 6.2, chewing its way
On 11/07/2012 10:49 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
A particular client's mirror of CentOS exploded today with the
unannounced CentOS 6.3 release. Congratulations to them for such quick
work: is there a nominal release date for SL 6.3, so I can make sure
to allocate disk space?
What is it with
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Steven Haigh net...@crc.id.au wrote:
On 11/07/2012 10:49 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
A particular client's mirror of CentOS exploded today with the
unannounced CentOS 6.3 release. Congratulations to them for such quick
work: is there a nominal release date for
On 11 July 2012 02:10, Akemi Yagi amy...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Steven Haigh net...@crc.id.au wrote:
On 11/07/2012 10:49 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
A particular client's mirror of CentOS exploded today with the
unannounced CentOS 6.3 release. Congratulations to
17 matches
Mail list logo
