The Sci-Fi Channel has become a clearing house for failed TV shows and B-movie
garbage instead of the cutting-edge network it started out as...I missed those
days...
By the way, how come they don't show some of the 'thoughtful garbage', Like
Collossus, The Forbin Project?
Martin [EMAIL
Martin: yes, but didn¹t you go to Smallville high? I¹m sure the meteor had
something to do with it. The same radiation that empowered Keith¹s Vikings?
I¹ll put money on that the tobacco industry will take a hit for this report
by the time Fox gets hold of it.
Since moving south, I HAVE
same here.
-- Original message --
From: Astromancer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A statement that may get me in trouble...I think most mature women are
practical in their thinking that way. Of course, that applies to men
also...sort of...Speaking for myself, I have my impulsive
You're right. The pilot was very good. Its tone was more sombre than much of
the series that followed. I remember Steve Austin all but crying after the
accident, and the disgusted look on his face when Dr. Wells showed him his
plastic-looking limbs and eye before the operation. There's a scene
Wish I could answer that for you, pal. I'm going to guess utter stupididity and
leave it at that.
Astromancer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The
Sci-Fi Channel has become a clearing house for failed TV shows and B-movie
garbage instead of the cutting-edge network it
I have the same question. Is it an issue of money? Do movies like Forbin,
Andromeda Strain, and others actually cost too much for the SciFi budget?
(Actually, didn't they show the Andromeda Strain last year?) I can think of a
few things that might be behind this:
* It actually costs too much
