Mr Worf, in cases like these, all I'm seeing/hearing is the money talking.
And anyone who believes that the courts are impartial... I've got prime
oceanfront property south of Rapid City that might interest them.
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Mr. Worf wrote:
>
>
> I'm always bothered at how of
I'm always bothered at how often the courts rule in favor of big businesses.
Sometimes it is because the courts don't know much about the issue at hand
so they play it safe. I believe this ruling is holding us back in unforeseen
ways.
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 5:33 AM, Martin Baxter wrote:
>
>
> A v
I'm willing to be first on the line in the war.
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 7:32 PM, Mr. Worf wrote:
>
>
> They are an evil entity that must be destroyed.
>
> On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Keith Johnson
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Man, this is really bad for us. I'm amazed that Comcast is allowed to
>> bl
A victory only for the broadband industry and their lobbyists. [?][?]
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 7:06 PM, Keith Johnson wrote:
>
>
> Man, this is really bad for us. I'm amazed that Comcast is allowed to block
> certain types of traffic without telling subscribers. But then, this is the
> same damn ou
They are an evil entity that must be destroyed.
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Keith Johnson wrote:
>
>
> Man, this is really bad for us. I'm amazed that Comcast is allowed to block
> certain types of traffic without telling subscribers. But then, this is the
> same damn outfit that cut off serv
Man, this is really bad for us. I'm amazed that Comcast is allowed to block
certain types of traffic without telling subscribers. But then, this is the
same damn outfit that cut off service to subscribers who were using "too much"
bandwidth on downloads, but refused to give a number as to what e
