Re: [scifinoir2] Re: "The Deadliest Warrior"-- SS vs. VC

2010-05-19 Thread Mr. Worf
How could they not give the VC the AK 47??? That was a major weapon that was used by them. On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 9:43 AM, B Smith wrote: > The flame thrower was too big of an advantage for the SS. The punji sticks > were good but no match for that. Interesting match but I wonder why they > did

[scifinoir2] Re: "The Deadliest Warrior"-- SS vs. VC

2010-05-19 Thread B Smith
> > - Original Message - > From: "B Smith" > To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2010 12:43:12 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern > Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: "The Deadliest Warrior"-- SS vs. VC > > > > > > >

Re: [scifinoir2] Re: "The Deadliest Warrior"-- SS vs. VC

2010-05-19 Thread Keith Johnson
: "B Smith" To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2010 12:43:12 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: "The Deadliest Warrior"-- SS vs. VC The flame thrower was too big of an advantage for the SS. The punji sticks were good but no mat

[scifinoir2] Re: "The Deadliest Warrior"-- SS vs. VC

2010-05-19 Thread B Smith
The flame thrower was too big of an advantage for the SS. The punji sticks were good but no match for that. Interesting match but I wonder why they didn't give the VC a rifle like the SKS or AK-47? That would probably would have been too big of technical advantage over the Germans. BTW they cal