From: "Martin Baxter"
To: "SciFiNoir2"
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 5:48:27 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Re: Scott and Crowe Back Again for Robin Hood
My neck tensed up at the sight of those words... it may be a day or three
before I can s
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
From: keithbjohn...@comcast.net
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 21:51:29 +0000
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Re: Scott and Crowe Back Again for Robin Hood
I hear you. Even his speech at the end--something to the effect of, "If a
January 19, 2010 3:31:03 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Re: Scott and Crowe Back Again for Robin Hood
Keith, as much as I love Morgan Freeman as an actor, I deny the existence of
that version of the movie. I was given it as a Christmas gift the holiday after
the mo
in bloody
hell hired the director?" -- Charles L Grant
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
From: keithbjohn...@comcast.net
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 15:15:36 +0000
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Re: Scott and Crowe Back Again
The Bergin version was more enjoyable. Thurman was a tough, plucky Marian. It's
the first role I ever saw Thurman in, I believe, and I liked it.
- Original Message -
From: "Kelwyn"
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 11:08:53 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Yeah, the Errol Flynn version is full of men laughing merrily, but that's the
main vision of Robin throughout the ages. I liked the Patrick Bergan/Uma
Thurman version as it was less...colorful. But Costner's? Dude that was dreck!
His accent kept fading in and out, for some reason Freeman's ch
I like how the princess kicks the butts of Robinhood and his merry men in
Shrek, but overall I've never gotten that worked up over Robinhood.
However, Kind Arthur and Sword and Sorcery... that's another story
-Original Message-
From: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogro
