RE: [scifinoir2] The No performance tax movement?

2010-02-12 Thread Martin Baxter
Not that I listen to radio anymore, but puh-LEEZE! It's not enough that stations have to pay licencing fees up the wa- and out the -zoo? I understands thet thuh Guv'mint's a-needin' its rev-nooh an' all, but there's an easier way to get it. Tax Big Pharma and the Insurance Cartels...

Re: [scifinoir2] The No performance tax movement?

2010-02-12 Thread Mr. Worf
They said that if passed 50% would go to the record companies, 45% to the performers and 5% would go to the musicians and singers. Still a raw deal for the performers like Stubblefield, and Bootsy that made James Brown's groove. On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Martin Baxter

RE: [scifinoir2] The No performance tax movement?

2010-02-12 Thread Martin Baxter
I'll believe that split ten minutes after all the checks are cashed. Someone, somewhere along the line, will skim something off for themselves. (That would be My Least Favorite Uncle Sam.)

Re: [scifinoir2] The No performance tax movement?

2010-02-12 Thread Mr. Worf
Nothing is going to the government. Its just a renaming ploy by the people that are against the RIAA. On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 5:54 PM, Martin Baxter truthseeker...@hotmail.comwrote: I'll believe that split ten minutes after all the checks are cashed. Someone, somewhere along the line, will

RE: [scifinoir2] The No performance tax movement?

2010-02-12 Thread Martin Baxter
: hellomahog...@gmail.com Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 17:59:14 -0800 Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] The No performance tax movement? Nothing is going to the government. Its just a renaming ploy by the people that are against the RIAA. On Fri, Feb 12