[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Couldn't agree more!
Keith, please contact me off list. Thanks,
Amy
This is the best news i've heard in ages, surpassing my excitement over
the Blade Runner DVD! I wonder why Jackson wants to do two films and how
he'll divide them? Can't wait for the Battle of Five
A friend sent the below, stating that the second film is actually more new
material, and not simply the second half of the book? Man, i was assuming
Jackson was *directing* the pictures! I really hope he does, though function as
executive producer is okay i guess. :(
I'm intrigued by what
source:
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3ie2960ff97697ea62
71399e8be7399978
Dec 19, 2007
NEW YORK -- The eagerly awaited prequels to the Lord of the Rings trilogy
will finally hit the big screen.
MGM and New Line have pacted to co-finance and co-distribute The Hobbit
A rare slice of good news from H'Wood.
Daryle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
source:
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3ie2960ff97697ea62
71399e8be7399978
Dec 19, 2007
NEW YORK -- The eagerly awaited prequels to the Lord of the Rings trilogy
will finally hit the big
It seems odd that they're making two films out the Hobbit? Anyone
know why?
Bosco
--- Daryle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
source:
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3ie2960ff97697ea62
71399e8be7399978
Dec 19, 2007
NEW YORK -- The eagerly awaited prequels to the
My brother in law just asked me this. Is it possibly that they do not
want to tell the story in just two or three hours and that they feel
they need four to six hours to tell the whole story?
Bosco Bosco wrote:
It seems odd that they're making two films out the Hobbit? Anyone
know why?
I would venture a guess it was because one picture would be 6 hours long.
The LOTR movies were pretty long and King Kong wasn¹t exactly something you
could catch before dinner.
On 12/18/07 2:47 PM, Bosco Bosco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems odd that they're making two films out
I wondered if it was that or some kind of ploy to sell more tickets.
Like two parts means you have to buy two tickets (albeit a year a
part)to see the whole story. It makes sense given they're filming the
whole thing at once. No real extra work to produce but more money
coming in the door. They
And, frankly, I don't think I'd *want* to have it told in two hours. I remember
being left severely wanting by the Rankin-Bass version, though it was a thing
of beauty. I still ring whenever I think about it.
Daryle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would venture a guess it was because one
This is the best news i've heard in ages, surpassing my excitement over the
Blade Runner DVD! I wonder why Jackson wants to do two films and how he'll
divide them? Can't wait for the Battle of Five Armies, and can't wait to see
Smaug! I'm really hoping that this time the Elven sword Glamdring
So they can sell twice as many tickets.
JJ Mohareb
On 12/18/07, Bosco Bosco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems odd that they're making two films out the Hobbit? Anyone
know why?
--
Read the Bitter Guide to the Bitter Guy.
http://thebitterguy.livejournal.com
McKellan said a few years ago he wanted to do it, and was concerned when all
the legalities would be worked out, given that one never knows how long one has
on this Earth.
-- Original message --
From: Bosco Bosco [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unless I am completely misinformed,
12 matches
Mail list logo
