I think perhaps that FAQ should be updated to say "nag if needed"!
Apologies for that delay, @olologin. Yes, it would be good if we had a
better way of organising reviewing priorities, but between github's feature
set and the distributed nature of the core dev team, we land up relying on
chance, o
The review process has always been quite slow; the only thing you can do is
ping and try to fix things on your side as quickly as possible. There are a
lot of PRs in development at any one time, and it's difficult for the
reviewers (let alone the contributors, as you mentioned) to keep track of
eve
Hi guys, I know scikit-learn may not be your main project, and you all
are very busy at work so you don't have free time to review all pull
requests, I understand it.
Is there something project leaders can do to speed-up review process?
Because I have bunch of pull requests which I made 5-7 mo
