2017-09-07 15:57 GMT+02:00 Thomas Evangelidis :
>
>
> On 7 September 2017 at 15:29, Maciek Wójcikowski
> wrote:
>
>> I think StandardScaller is what you want. For each assay you will get
>> mean and var. Average mean would be the "optimal" shift and average
>> variance the spread. But would this
On 7 September 2017 at 15:29, Maciek Wójcikowski
wrote:
> I think StandardScaller is what you want. For each assay you will get mean
> and var. Average mean would be the "optimal" shift and average variance the
> spread. But would this value make any physical sense?
>
> I think you missed my poi
I think StandardScaller is what you want. For each assay you will get mean
and var. Average mean would be the "optimal" shift and average variance the
spread. But would this value make any physical sense?
Considering the RF-Score-VS: In fact it's a regressor and it predicts a
real value, not a cla