> Isn't Jérémie's project at
https://github.com/jeremiedbb/scikit-learn_benchmarks meant to be doing
this? What's its status? How does it relate to Tom's work?
Yes it's the same project. Tom kindly accepted to run it alongside other
projects from the pydata ecosystem.
> I can't find it back
it's the same projects.
Alex
___
scikit-learn mailing list
scikit-learn@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
Isn't Jérémie's project at
https://github.com/jeremiedbb/scikit-learn_benchmarks meant to be doing
this? What's its status? How does it relate to Tom's work?
(Can we please take http://scikit-learn.org/ml-benchmarks/ offline?)
On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 at 00:17, Nicolas Hug wrote:
> I agree having be
I agree having benchmarks for non regression would be very helpful. A
seemingly simple change in Cython code can lead to drastic performance drop.
I can't find it back but I think Jérémie has submitted an issue about this?
On 7/22/19 9:59 AM, Tom Augspurger wrote:
Thanks Adrin,
A month or so
Thanks Adrin,
A month or so ago I started running scikit-learn benchmarks, but I had to
disable them since they were taking too long (longer than a day).
I haven't had time to investigate why, but I assume it was an issue with
how I set them up.
Just FYI, I'm planning to include "maintain and imp
Hi,
There is this [page](https://pandas.pydata.org/speed/scikit-learn/)
maintained by some of the pandas maintainers (@TomAugspurger in
particular), and it seems like a really good idea to have an eye on the
performance of different benchmarks through time just in case a PR
introduces some major d
