Ok. Thanks for the comments!
On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 6:22 PM, Gael Varoquaux <
gael.varoqu...@normalesup.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 03:10:26PM +0200, Raghav R V wrote:
> > I felt we could rather have a clean build and wait for a few more
> minutes (if
> > that's the disadvantage of disa
On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 03:10:26PM +0200, Raghav R V wrote:
> I felt we could rather have a clean build and wait for a few more minutes (if
> that's the disadvantage of disabling caching) than have it pass / fail on old
> code...
Time of CI is a real problem. On our side because it slows down merg
I felt we could rather have a clean build and wait for a few more minutes
(if that's the disadvantage of disabling caching) than have it pass / fail
on old code...
On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 11:39 PM, Andreas Mueller wrote:
> Why do you think it should be disabled instead of fixed?
>
>
>
> On 08/07/
Why do you think it should be disabled instead of fixed?
On 08/07/2016 08:39 AM, Raghav R V wrote:
Could someone disable the Travis cache once and for all please?
I have seen several frustrating incidents where the Travis fails the
PR because of this caching of old files.
I also don't under
hi,
I just flushed all the caches.
HTH
Alex
On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 2:39 PM, Raghav R V wrote:
> Could someone disable the Travis cache once and for all please?
>
> I have seen several frustrating incidents where the Travis fails the PR
> because of this caching of old files.
>
> I also don't un
