Re: [scikit-learn] suggested classification algorithm

2016-11-17 Thread Sebastian Raschka
ata Science > > 5985 State Bridge Road, Johns Creek, GA 30097 | [email protected] > > > > From: scikit-learn > > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > > Of Fernando Marcos Wittmann > > Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 20

Re: [scikit-learn] suggested classification algorithm

2016-11-17 Thread Dale T Smith
ann > Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2016 3:11 PM > To: Scikit-learn user and developer mailing list > Subject: Re: [scikit-learn] suggested classification algorithm > > ⚠ EXT MSG: > Three based algorithms (like Random Forest) usually work well for imbalanced > datasets. You

Re: [scikit-learn] suggested classification algorithm

2016-11-16 Thread Sebastian Raschka
State Bridge Road, Johns Creek, GA 30097 | [email protected] > > From: scikit-learn > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Fernando Marcos Wittmann > Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2016 3:11 PM > To: Scikit-learn user and dev

Re: [scikit-learn] suggested classification algorithm

2016-11-16 Thread Dale T Smith
[email protected] From: scikit-learn [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Fernando Marcos Wittmann Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2016 3:11 PM To: Scikit-learn user and developer mailing list Subject: Re: [scikit-learn] suggested classification algorithm

Re: [scikit-learn] suggested classification algorithm

2016-11-16 Thread Fernando Marcos Wittmann
Three based algorithms (like Random Forest) usually work well for imbalanced datasets. You can also take a look at the SMOTE technique ( http://jair.org/media/953/live-953-2037-jair.pdf) which you can use for over-sampling the positive observations. On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 9:14 AM, Thomas Evangeli

Re: [scikit-learn] suggested classification algorithm

2016-11-14 Thread Joel Nothman
http://contrib.scikit-learn.org/imbalanced-learn/ might be of interest to you. On 14 November 2016 at 22:14, Thomas Evangelidis wrote: > Greetings, > > I want to design a program that can deal with classification problems of > the same type, where the number of positive observations is small bu