Can we add this to the FAQ as out of scope?
Sebastian: feel free to put more into mlxtend :P
On 12/17/18 1:46 AM, Sebastian Raschka wrote:
Hi Rui,
I agree with Joel that association rule mining could be a bit tricky to fit
nicely within the scikit-learn API. Maybe this could be some
I checked on 0.20.1 using scikit-learn shipped by Anaconda and both seem to
have the same default.
On Mon, 17 Dec 2018 at 16:01, Guillaume Lemaître
wrote:
> could you provide the scikit-learn version in both case?
>
> Sent from my phone - sorry to be brief and potential misspell.
> *From:*
could you provide the scikit-learn version in both case?Sent from my phone - sorry to be brief and potential misspell.
Thank you for your quick reply. It's very helpful.
It's because of Anaconda: Its python stops the iteration soon as follows
(w/ verbose=True).
I am not sure why 'n_iter_no_change=10' is changed in Anaconda.
Anaconda might modify the MLPClassifier implementation.
> python learn.py (in pure
