Re: [scikit-learn] Understanding sklearn.tree._tree.value object

Hi Pranav, The reason you're getting that output is that your first column has a single value (1), and that becomes your "first" class, hence your first value in the rows you're interpreting. To understand it better, you can try to check this code: >>> from sklearn.preprocessing import MultiLabe

Re: [scikit-learn] Understanding sklearn.tree._tree.value object

1. If you want to interpret the results, you can combine the infor you get from `clf.tree_.value` with `clf.classes_`, and then you should be fine. On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 at 05:27 Pranav Ashok wrote: > Hi Adrin, > > Thanks for the clarification. Is there a right way of letting > DecisionTr

Re: [scikit-learn] Google Season of Docs

mulated projects out of these ideas, and I care enough about documentation that I can give a hand wherever you think I can be useful. Cheers, Adrin. On Thu, 25 Oct 2018 at 18:47 Andreas Mueller wrote: > Hey. > Are we interested in the Google Season of Docs? > > https://docs.google.com/for

Re: [scikit-learn] Next Sprint

Not sure if it counts and/or it'll be as fruitful as one of yours, but we're trying to gauge/raise the interest in a meetup this coming Tuesday in Berlin, and if there's interest, we'll try to organize one in Jan/Feb. Cheers, Adrin. On Thu, 15 Nov 2018 at 15:44 Gael Varoqua

Re: [scikit-learn] New core dev: Adrin Jalali

Thank you all for all the support, patience, and mentorship you've had and now having me on board. It's an absolute pleasure working with you :) On Sun, 9 Dec 2018 at 10:10 Guillaume Lemaître wrote: > Congrats Adrin > > Sent from my phone - sorry to be brief and potentia

Re: [scikit-learn] Next Sprint

It'll be the least favourable week of February for me, but I can make do. On Thu, 20 Dec 2018 at 18:45 Andreas Mueller wrote: > Works for me! > > On 12/19/18 5:33 PM, Gael Varoquaux wrote: > > I would propose the week of Feb 25th, as I heard people say that they > > might be available at this t

Re: [scikit-learn] PR #13003: [MRG] Add Tensor Sketch algorithm to Kernel Approximation module

Hi Daniel, Thanks for the note, but sometimes there can be quite some delay in us reviewing a PR; and the discussion about a PR best should happen on the PR itself. Best, Adrin. On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 at 10:57 Daniel López-Sánchez wrote: > Dear all, > > I recently posted a PR

Re: [scikit-learn] sklearn.cluster.OPTICS

Hi, OPTICS is still under development and there are quite a few open issues and PRs regarding the method. It's available on master, but not on any of the releases yet. We will hopefully have it out for the next release. Best, Adrin. On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 at 14:31 Mohit Srivastava < mohit

Re: [scikit-learn] sklearn.cluster.OPTICS

on of sklearn, OPTICS should be > available... > > Can you be a bit more specific about how it isn't working? Are you > running into an error? > Best, > Shane > > On 01/29, Adrin wrote: > >Hi, > > > >OPTICS is still under development and there are quite

Re: [scikit-learn] VOTE: scikit-learn governance document

+1 Thanks for the work you've put in it! On Sat, Feb 9, 2019, 03:00 Andreas Mueller Hey all. > > I want to call a vote on the final version on the scikit-learn > governance document, which can be found in this PR: > > https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/pull/12878 > > It underwent some

Re: [scikit-learn] Sprint discussion points?

for now it's pretty hacky. So I'd be happy if we discuss the union of what Joel and Andy suggest. Cheers, Adrin. On Thu, Feb 14, 2019, 11:47 Guillaume Lemaître I am really interested in the union of the list given by Andy and Joel. > > I'll like to have some discussions related

Re: [scikit-learn] Sprint discussion points?

> Does OPTICS require a meeting or is it clear what to do and the work > "just" needs to be done? Definitely needs (some) discussions. On Tue, Feb 19, 2019, 18:25 Andreas Mueller > > On 2/14/19 11:40 AM, Nicolas Hug wrote: > > > >> or we could go as far as to schedule meetings on the different t

Re: [scikit-learn] Consultation: eligibility of inclusion of speed-up?

To me the maintainability of the added code also plays a role, and this PR is really nice and short in its implementation. It needs better documentation (other than the plot_ file) to better demonstrate its benefits, otherwise looks reasonable to have it IMO. On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 11:11 AM Gael

Re: [scikit-learn] Mahalanobis distance metric in OPTICS

Mahalanobis is always tricky, the covariance is between the features, not the samples. This works: OPTICS(metric='mahalanobis',metric_params={'VI': np.linalg.inv(np.cov(test_array.T))}).fit(test_array) Not sure why it wouldn't work when you pass V, as it suggests as an alternative. On Fri, May 3

Re: [scikit-learn] Google code reviews

Would we need to nominate PRs for them to review, or would they find them on their own? Either case, could use a hand and extra eyes, why not On Sat., May 25, 2019, 16:10 Joel Nothman, wrote: > For some of the larger PRs, this might be helpful. Not going to help where > the intricacies of Scikit

Re: [scikit-learn] How use get_depth

The function is added in the latest release, you probably need to update the package and then you should have it. On Mon., Jun. 17, 2019, 15:42 Brown J.B. via scikit-learn, < scikit-learn@python.org> wrote: > Perhaps you mean: > DecisionTreeRegressor.tree_.max_depth , where DecisionTreeRegressor.

Re: [scikit-learn] New core developer: jeremiedbb

woohoo, congrats Jeremie :) On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 10:14 AM Olivier Grisel wrote: > The core developers of Scikit-learn have recently voted to welcome > Jérémie Du Boisberranger to the team, in recognition of his efforts > and trustworthiness as contributor. Jérémie's works at Inria Saclay > and

Re: [scikit-learn] Monthly meetings between core developers

oject, but having regular meetings to me is independent of that, and I'd really like to hear in these meetings from people like Joel and Hanmin too. Cheers, Adrin. On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 8:52 PM Nicolas Hug wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > The scikit-learn team have been expanding signi

Re: [scikit-learn] Monthly meetings between core developers

BTW, where was the meeting for last Monday organized? I don't think I knew it was happening. On Thu., Jul. 18, 2019, 08:02 Olivier Grisel, wrote: > +1 for last Monday of each month. How about the duration? 1h max + > breakout in smaller groups on more specific topics if needed? > > > ___

Re: [scikit-learn] Monthly meetings between core developers

Ah sorry, my eyes skipped the "of the month" part of "last Monday of the month". My bad! On Thu., Jul. 18, 2019, 08:39 Olivier Grisel, wrote: > Le jeu. 18 juil. 2019 à 08:29, Adrin a écrit : > > > > BTW, where was the meeting for last Monday organized? I do

Re: [scikit-learn] Monthly meetings between core developers + "Hello World"

Awesome, excited to have your help around :) We already have the @core-devs team on github, we can use it more often/more organized. On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 2:48 PM Chiara Marmo wrote: > Dear list, > > I'm Chiara, in September I will start to work full time for the > Scikit-Learn Consortium at

[scikit-learn] Continues monitoring of benchmark performances

drawbacks. However, he doesn't have the bandwidth to maintain it much more, and not really the hardware. I think it'd be a good idea for us to have that, wanted to bring it up and see what you think! Cheers, Adrin. ___ scikit-learn mailing l

Re: [scikit-learn] Monthly meetings between core developers + "Hello World"

That's kinda what I meant. I didn't mean to limit the access to the project to @core-devs, I meant they can be pinged. On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 3:56 PM Andreas Mueller wrote: > > On 7/22/19 9:22 AM, Adrin wrote: > > Awesome, excited to have your help around :) > > We

Re: [scikit-learn] Long term roadmap and moonshot goals

ull time people (Oliver, Jeremy, > Guillaume, Nicolas, Thomas, Adrin) on scikit-learn (GO TEAM!!), I think > it's realistic > to achieve most of these within a year or two. We have actually made > some significant progress already. > > I think now would be a good time to start

Re: [scikit-learn] Forest Decision path

Hi, Not sure what you've done and what exactly you need, but for a "fast" solution, you probably need to dig into `sklearn/tree/_tree.pyx`. Adrin/ On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 6:08 PM Surya D wrote: > Hello! I am Surya, a student of the machine learning world. I am currently >

[scikit-learn] Outreachy program

Would that be okay if we apply? The deadline has just passed, but if they're flexible, we may be able to still apply. Thanks, Adrin. ___ scikit-learn mailing list scikit-learn@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn

Re: [scikit-learn] Vote on SLEP009: keyword only arguments

It's a yes for me. On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 3:20 AM Joel Nothman wrote: > As per our Governance > document, changes to API principles are to be established through an > Enhancement Proposal (SLEP) from which any core developer can call for a > vote

Re: [scikit-learn] Vote on SLEP009: keyword only arguments

P. In other words, if an input parameter is used as a positional argument less frequently than X% of the time, then it can/should be a keyword only argument. But the SLEP better defines these conditions. I hope that clarifies it a little bit. Adrin/ On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 3:23 PM Alexandre G

Re: [scikit-learn] New contribution

and see how the activity goes on the repo, and you may be able to find a recently reported issue interesting before others claim it. I hope these hints help, and hope to see your contributions soon :) Best, Adrin. On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 10:55 AM Bartosz Podkanowicz < podkanowicz.bart...@gmail

[scikit-learn] Reminder: Monday October 28th meeting

As usual, it'd be nice to have them on the board before the weekend :) See you on Monday, Adrin. ___ scikit-learn mailing list scikit-learn@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn

Re: [scikit-learn] scikit-learn Digest, Vol 43, Issue 38

on tree results sometimes different with scaled > data (Alexandre Gramfort) >2. Reminder: Monday October 28th meeting (Adrin) > > > -- > > Message: 1 > Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 14:09:01 +0200 > From

Re: [scikit-learn] scikit-learn twitter account

sounds pretty good to me :) On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 10:51 AM Chiara Marmo wrote: > Hello everybody, > > I've taken a look to the last meeting minutes: talking about releases and > sprint announcements, it seems that the need for a centralized > communication channel is rising, both from user and

Re: [scikit-learn] scikit-learn twitter account

I think re-purposing and having somebody or a team tweet using it only the ones which matter (like the ones we do tweet about from our own tweeter accounts every now and then) much more useful. Plus whatever news we have for the community. On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 9:01 AM Roman Yurchak wrote: > Ma

Re: [scikit-learn] WiLMDS bay area sprint

Nice, Waiting for the pings ;) Cheers, Adrin. On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 4:19 PM Chiara Marmo wrote: > Hello scikit-learn devs, > > this message just to let you know that I'm helping @reshamas to follow-up > the PRs created at the WiLMDS bay area sprint. > Hope you don't

[scikit-learn] ANN: Release Candidate for Scikit-learn 0.22

Hello everybody! A new release candidate is out, and PyPI now has source and binary releases for Scikit-learn 0.22rc2.post1. * Documentation at https://scikit-learn.org/0.22 (with a new web design) * Release Notes at https://scikit-learn.org/0.22/whats_new * Download source or wheels at https://p

[scikit-learn] ANN: scikit-learn 0.22rc3, supporting Python=3.8

Hi everybody, We just released 0.22rc3 which includes python=3.8 wheels which builds on top of 0.22rc2 and has a few issues fixed. We will be releasing 0.22.0 final early next week, and more than happy to have you all test the release candidate. Happy testing, Adrin, on behalf of the scikit

[scikit-learn] ANN: scikit-learn 0.22 final release

-0-22. This version supports Python versions 3.5 to 3.8. You can give it a go using `pip install -U scikit-learn` while conda and conda forge binaries are coming. Regards, Adrin, on behalf of the scikit-learn maintainer team. ___ scikit-learn mailing list s

Re: [scikit-learn] Vote on SLEP010: n_features_in_ attribute

+1 On Tue., Dec. 3, 2019, 23:28 Andreas Mueller, wrote: > +1 > > On 12/3/19 5:09 PM, Nicolas Hug wrote: > > As per our Governance > document, changes to API principles are to be established through an > Enhancement Proposal (SLEP) from which any c

Re: [scikit-learn] Vote on SLEP010: n_features_in_ attribute

As far as I remember, one idea is to have a deprecation cycle with a FutureWarning on check estimator to give third party developers implement the new API. On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 10:52 AM Joel Nothman wrote: > We are looking to have n_features_out_ for transformers. This naming makes > the diffe

Re: [scikit-learn] Vote on SLEP010: n_features_in_ attribute

I really don't think Py2.x should be our concern anymore. The kind of spaghetti code you mention is somewhat the nature of supporting multiple versions of a dependency library. We do have similar code in our code base which deals with different versions of our own dependencies. On Wed, Dec 4, 201

Re: [scikit-learn] Paris Sprint in January and wiki update

Awesome, thanks. Tweeting about them sounds good to me. But I can't find the threading option from the tweetdeck. I see it only from the app or the main website, and I can't tweet on @scikit-learn's behalf from there. On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 11:43 AM Chiara Marmo wrote: > Dear all, > > as promi

[scikit-learn] Using a new random number generator in libsvm and liblinear

w. We'd like to hear any concerns on the matter from the community, here or on the PR, before merging the fix. Best, Adrin. ___ scikit-learn mailing list scikit-learn@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn

Re: [scikit-learn] Vote on SLEP010: n_features_in_ attribute

According to our governance model, this vote is now closed and accepted, and the implementation shall take the concerns mentioned here into account. Thanks everybody for the attention and the discussion. On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 6:36 PM Thomas J Fan wrote: > I am +1. I aggree with Joel that we

Re: [scikit-learn] Time for Roadmap for the coming years?

Hi, Although that roadmap was written in 2018, we recently updated it and it still stands. Other than that, we also have an issue discussing the version 1.0 milestones: https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/14386 Thanks, Adrin. On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 11:26 AM Siddharth Gupta

Re: [scikit-learn] Changes in the classifier

Outside GIL, you can't really work easily with Python objects. You should instead stick to local C variables and routines. For instance, instead of numpy routines, you can use cmath routines. The cython book ( https://www.amazon.com/Cython-Programmers-Kurt-W-Smith/dp/1491901551) and Nicolas's post

Re: [scikit-learn] Assigning reviewers to PRs

under your PR saying "a gentle ping" or something would probably remind us that it's still not reviewed :) Thanks for contributing, Adrin. On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 6:33 AM Madhura Jayaratne wrote: > Hi Scikit-learn team, > > I have submitted a PR implementing support

[scikit-learn] SLEP013 VOTE: n_features_out_

hancement_proposals/pull/36> which proposes to accept the SLEP. Final comments are more than welcome. Following is the short version of the SLEP. Regards, Adrin. Abstract This SLEP proposes the introduction of a public ``n_features_out_`` attribute for most transformers (where

Re: [scikit-learn] Monthly meetings

The meeting notes are now available at: https://github.com/scikit-learn/administrative/blob/master/meeting_notes/2020-02-24.md On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 12:07 AM Nicolas Hug wrote: > Hi all, > > The next scikit-learn monthly meeting will take place on Monday at the > usual time ( > https://www.ti

[scikit-learn] Conference call regarding feature names

p;p4=179&p5=195 Here's the info to the call: Join Zoom Meeting https://anaconda.zoom.us/j/158272910?pwd=NURzbWhTSXNYNFhRMVYxRFVybjUrdz09 Meeting ID: 158 272 910 Password: 5867453 Find your local number: https://anaconda.zoom.us/u/adk50yIacN Best, Adrin. ___

Re: [scikit-learn] tensorflow and scikit-learn

skorch is another nice library to do DL in sklearn based environments/workflows. On Tue., Mar. 3, 2020, 13:37 Nicolas Hug, wrote: > Hi Nils, > > From a quick glance it looks like you're building a fully connected > multi-layer perceptron so yes, this is possible in scikit-learn with the > neural

Re: [scikit-learn] Monthly meetings

Hi, The new meeting ID: https://anaconda.zoom.us/j/324780759?pwd=a1ROSFE2Nnc0cHBaeUtiVS93QnpHQT09 Meeting ID: 324 780 759 Password: 617892 On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 9:00 PM Nicolas Hug wrote: > Hi all, > > The next scikit-learn monthly meeting will take place on Monday ( > https://www.timeandda

Re: [scikit-learn] April 27th scikit-learn monthly meeting

Hi Hermes, It's 12pm (noon) UTC Thanks for asking. Best, Adrin. On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 12:37 PM Hermes Morales wrote: > Thank you Chiara > Which is the usual time? > > Obtener Outlook para Android <https://aka.ms/ghei36> > > -- &g

[scikit-learn] ANN: scikit-learn 0.23 RC1

release_highlights_0_23_0.html Changelog: https://scikit-learn.org/0.23/whats_new/v0.23.html#changes-0-23 Happy testing, Adrin On behalf of the scikit-learn team ___ scikit-learn mailing list scikit-learn@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn

[scikit-learn] ANN scikit-learn 0.23.0 release

kernel=kernel). This version supports Python versions 3.6 to 3.8. You can give it a go using `pip install -U scikit-learn` or alternatively `conda install -c conda-forge scikit-learn` which should be there soon. Regards, Adrin, on behalf of the scikit-learn maintainer team.

[scikit-learn] ANN: scikit-learn 0.23.1 release

e the changelog here: https://scikit-learn.org/stable/whats_new/v0.23.html#version-0-23-1 The conda-forge builds will be available shortly, which you can then install using: conda install -c conda-forge scikit-learn On behalf of the scikit-learn development community,

Re: [scikit-learn] Notes core-dev meeting May 25th

Thanks Chiara, I think I'm missing the link to the agenda. Where should I find it? Thanks, Adrin On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 7:51 PM Chiara Marmo wrote: > Dear core-devs, > > I've taken the liberty to build a skeleton for the meeting notes. > Please, have a look and let me

Re: [scikit-learn] major league hacking summer internship program

Sounds pretty cool to me. On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 6:45 PM wrote: > Hey Folks. > > This program reached out to me: > > > https://news.mlh.io/mlh-fellowship-the-future-of-tech-internships-05-04-2020 > > > > What do you think? > > Sounds like GSOC but with extra mentorship, so it might be a good fi

Re: [scikit-learn] Welcome to the TC Adrin!

Hi, Thank you all for all your support, patience, and your trust on me since I started :) I hope to serve the community well. Best, Adrin On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 10:43 PM Andreas C. Mueller < andreasmuelle...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear all! > > > > It’s my pleasure to an

Re: [scikit-learn] major league hacking summer internship program

Thanks Andy, sounds pretty cool. I can commit some reviewing time. There should be maybe two of us at least that they know they can ping, and we can ping others if needed. Cheers, Adrin On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 11:35 PM Andreas C. Mueller < andreasmuelle...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Folk

[scikit-learn] Fwd: [Numpy-discussion] start of an array (tensor) and dataframe API standardization initiative

FYI: Related to the data-frame like discussions we've been having. -- Forwarded message - From: Ralf Gommers Date: Mon., Aug. 17, 2020, 22:35 Subject: [Numpy-discussion] start of an array (tensor) and dataframe API standardization initiative To: Discussion of Numerical Python H

Re: [scikit-learn] Python Version Support Policy

I'd be in favor of whatever the conclusion of the same question on the scipy-dev thread be ( https://mail.python.org/pipermail/scipy-dev/2020-August/024318.html) which seems to be dropping 3.6 for the next release. But I don't think we're going to be supporting only 3 latest releases especially sin

Re: [scikit-learn] New Contributor: Greetings from Brazil

Hi, Hope you enjoy contributing and stick around :) Happy learning. Adrin On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 7:42 PM Ivomar Brito Soares wrote: > Hello everyone, > > My name is Ivomar and I am a machine learning engineer | data scientist > from Brazil. I have been working with machine le

Re: [scikit-learn] New members of the triage team: Albert, Lucy, & Reshama

I'm very excited to have a triage team, and very much appreciate the work you all put into maintaining our issue tracker and PRs. Welcome on board :) On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 6:57 PM Gael Varoquaux < gael.varoqu...@normalesup.org> wrote: > We are excited to welcome new members to the triage team:

Re: [scikit-learn] About the Boston housing prices dataset

kage as long as users can still download it with a oneliner using fetch_openml. Cheers, Adrin On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 2:00 PM Olivier Grisel wrote: > Thanks for your input, this is also an extension I was thinking of. > ___ > scikit-learn mai

Re: [scikit-learn] About the Boston housing prices dataset

ome people will keep using boston from openml, and not care about the ethical implications As an addition, we can keep the load_boston in the docs only, and point users to alternatives even after removing the loader. On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 10:11 AM Olivier Grisel wrote: > Le mar. 13 oct. 2020 à

Re: [scikit-learn] Changes in Travis billing

Shall I contact them? Any other volunteers? On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 11:51 AM Gael Varoquaux < gael.varoqu...@normalesup.org> wrote: > Travis is changing it's billing strategy: > https://blog.travis-ci.com/2020-11-02-travis-ci-new-billing > > Open repositories are getting a free initial set of cred

Re: [scikit-learn] Changes in Travis billing

I tried contacting them a few times, but they don't really respond in any meaningful way, or at all. At this point I'm at a loss, and reading the NumFocus chat and other packages' experience with them on the same topic, seems like we just need to move out of Travis. Cheers, Adrin

Re: [scikit-learn] Changes in Travis billing

rovide? >> >> -- Original Message -- >> From: "Gael Varoquaux" >> To: "Scikit-learn mailing list" >> Sent: 11/26/2020 6:12:12 AM >> Subject: Re: [scikit-learn] Changes in Travis billing >> >> >On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 03:

Re: [scikit-learn] Presented scikit-learn to the French President

Nice, such a milestone! On Fri., Dec. 4, 2020, 23:59 Gael Varoquaux, wrote: > Hi scikit-learn community, > > Today, I presented some efforts in digital health to the French president > and part of the government. As these efforts were partly powered by > scikit-learn (and the whole pydata stack,

Re: [scikit-learn] Changes in Travis billing

s insane… >> scikit-image got some credits ( >> https://github.com/scikit-image/scikit-image-wheels/pull/47#issuecomment-736760539) >> without much issue… Maybe someone should reach out directly on this thread >> to the travis people? >> >> Cheers, >> N >

[scikit-learn] Daily failure: Run failed: Wheel builder - master (1e53ae2)

Hi, I keep getting this email every night, sending it here to make sure we're aware of it. Cheers, Adrin -- Forwarded message - From: Adrin Jalali Date: Thu., Dec. 17, 2020, 05:21 Subject: [adrinjalali/scikit-learn] Run failed: Wheel builder - master (1e53ae2) To: adrinj

[scikit-learn] Renaming the default branch to `main`

h, but since this is a major change, hence this email to engage and inform the broader community. Cheers, Adrin ___ scikit-learn mailing list scikit-learn@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn

[scikit-learn] Crypto project to fund open source

I just got this on the pandas-dev mailing list. Seems rather interesting! -- Forwarded message - From: Marc Garcia Date: Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 2:21 PM Subject: [Pandas-dev] Crypto project to fund open source To: pandas-dev Hi, I've been contacting regarding a crypto project that

Re: [scikit-learn] Crypto project to fund open source

vote would be a no wrt. this platform. Cheers, Adrin On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 6:13 PM Adrin wrote: > I just got this on the pandas-dev mailing list. Seems rather interesting! > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Marc Garcia > Date: Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 2:21 PM > Subje

Re: [scikit-learn] Open Source: sustainability and etiquette

This is a really good initiative Reshama, thanks for sharing. Have you seen CHAOSScon talks and activities? They're really good, and touch on a lot of really good stuff when it comes to open source communities and sustainability. Eg.: https://chaoss.community/chaosscon-2020-eu/ Cheers,

[scikit-learn] Understanding Our Contributors - NumFOCUS survey

Hi all, NumFOCUS , our fiscal sponsorship organization, is conducting a research project looking into understanding the diversity, inclusion and barriers to participation within NumFOCUS-sponsored projects and the wider open source community. The survey

Re: [scikit-learn] custom scorer needs group information: how?

Hi Emanuele, In the meantime, you could also try the hack I have written here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/49581104/sklearn-gridsearchcv-not-using-sample-weight-in-score-function/49598597#49598597 Cheers, Adrin On Sat, May 22, 2021 at 7:54 PM Emanuele Olivetti < emanuele.ol

Re: [scikit-learn] New member of the triage team: Julien

Congratulations Julien. Happy to have you in the team :) On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 9:26 AM Guillaume Lemaître wrote: > We are excited to welcome a new member of the triage team: > > * Julien Jerphanion https://github.com/jjerphan > > The thorough work of the triage team on helping the community is

Re: [scikit-learn] New member of the triage team: Norbert

Welcome to the team Norbert! On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 11:34 AM Guillaume Lemaître wrote: > We are excited to welcome a new member of the triage team: > > * Norbert Preining https://github.com/norbusan > > The thorough work of the triage team on helping the scikit-learn > community by triaging iss

[scikit-learn] HOWTO fix your merge conflicts after we've applied `black`

Best, Adrin ___ scikit-learn mailing list scikit-learn@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn

Re: [scikit-learn] [TC Vote] Technical Committee vote: line length

> Keep current 88 characters: > Revert to 79 characters: Adrin Jalali On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 1:03 AM Gael Varoquaux < gael.varoqu...@normalesup.org> wrote: > This email is meant for the scikit-learn Technical Committee, and is on > the public mailing list for transparency.

Re: [scikit-learn] [Data Umbrella] scikit-learn Latin America sprint (June 2021)

Thanks for doing this Reshama. On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 1:33 PM Reshama Shaikh wrote: > Hello, > The report from the Data Umbrella Latin America scikit-learn sprint is > here [a]. > > 40 people, including 7 countries in Latin America, joined. > > TAKEAWAYS > - translations are useful. English is

[scikit-learn] Pandas copy-on-write proposal

permail/pandas-dev/2021-July/001358.html>. It would be nice for us to think about the implications of this proposal on our work related to supporting pandas dataframes. Cheers, Adrin ___ scikit-learn mailing list scikit-learn@python.org https://mail.p

[scikit-learn] [ANNOUNCEMENT] scikit-learn 1.0 release

Class SVM, and much more! This version supports Python versions 3.7 to 3.9. A big thanks to all contributors for making this release possible. Regards, Adrin, On the behalf of the scikit-learn maintainer team. ___ scikit-learn mailing list scikit-

Re: [scikit-learn] [Data Umbrella] AFME (Africa & Middle East) scikit-learn open source sprint (scikit-learn)

Thanks Reshama, That's a really nice report! On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 12:01 PM Reshama Shaikh wrote: > Hello, > The report from the Data Umbrella Africa & Middle East sprint is here [a]. > > SUMMARY > - 40 people joined > - 17 countries represented > - 57% were returning contributors > > There a

[scikit-learn] Call for a vote on: Accept SLEP000: SLEP and its workflow

2/3 of the cast votes are in favor. Best, Adrin ___ scikit-learn mailing list scikit-learn@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn

Re: [scikit-learn] What is the ECCN (Export Control Classification Number) number & COO (Country of Origin) of scikit-learn

Hi, What's exactly the reason you need this information? Best, Adrin On Mon., Jan. 10, 2022, 14:51 Anup Arun Yadav via scikit-learn, < scikit-learn@python.org> wrote: > Hey Team, > > > > I’ve subscribed but don’t know from where to post, please send URL also > P

[scikit-learn] VOTE: SLEP006 - Metadata Routing

odel it will pass if 2/3 of the cast vote from core developers are in favor, with no quorum/minimum participation requirements. Regards, Adrin ___ scikit-learn mailing list scikit-learn@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn

[scikit-learn] Metadata Routing Survey

vey here <https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSd8G8xwKKJ2gJKmqcyZafi6z3mMQdDDiHffEOE0dPt2gKSanw/viewform?usp=sf_link>. It'll take just a few minutes, and it would really help us finalize the work and have it ready sooner for you to benefi

Re: [scikit-learn] Converting Scikit-learn Models to C code

Hi, For purposes other than teaching, you should't use the neural network implementation provided in sklearn. For SVMs, you could try ONNX, it's not C, but it may satisfy your requirement. Best, Adrin On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 1:18 PM David Tian via scikit-learn < scikit-learn@pyth

[scikit-learn] PEP 688: Making the buffer protocol accessible in Python

f the given type implements the buffer protocol might be relevant. Cheers, Adrin -- Forwarded message - From: Jelle Zijlstra Date: Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 2:02 PM Subject: [Numpy-discussion] PEP 688: Making the buffer protocol accessible in Python To: Discussion of Numerical Python I

Re: [scikit-learn] [ANN] scikit-learn 1.1 release

Thanks a ton for the efforts Jeremie! Delighted to see the release out! On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 5:21 PM Jeremie du Boisberranger < jeremie.du-boisberran...@inria.fr> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > We're happy to announce the 1.1 release which you can install via pip or > conda: > > pip install -U

Re: [scikit-learn] View full sized k_means.labels_

Hi there, You can set print options for numpy: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1987694/how-to-print-the-full-numpy-array-without-truncation But you most probably don't want to do that. If you need to print them, you can iterate through them and print them, or iterate and create a string that

Re: [scikit-learn] [ANN] scikit-learn 1.1.2 is online!

Thanks for taking care of this Guillaume. On Sat., Aug. 6, 2022, 00:43 Guillaume Lemaître, wrote: > scikit-learn 1.1.2 is out on pypi.org and conda-forge! > > This is a small maintenance release that fixes a couple of regressions: > https://scikit-learn.org/dev/whats_new/v1.1.html#version-1-1-2

Re: [scikit-learn] Query about backword compatibility of scikit-learn 1.2 with older versions of scikit-learn

all of them, but you can get an idea by carefully reading our changelog: https://scikit-learn.org/dev/whats_new.html Best, Adrin On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 9:28 PM Mehul Kantaria wrote: > Hello, > > I am going to start development of a tool with scikit-learn 1.2 as my > project work.

[scikit-learn] Fwd: [SciPy-Dev] Use of another CI provider for native linux_aarch64 and macosx_arm64

Just FYI. The difference in build times seem quite significant. -- Forwarded message - From: Andrew Nelson Date: Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 12:37 PM Subject: [SciPy-Dev] Use of another CI provider for native linux_aarch64 and macosx_arm64 To: scipy-dev Hi all, I've been investigati

Re: [scikit-learn] VotingRegressor with pretrained estimators from CV as input

Hi, It's easy to write a meta-estimator and store it. You can write one for yourself in a few lines of code. This might help: https://github.com/adrinjalali/talks/blob/master/2022/sklearn-estimator-ODSC/custom_estimators_solved.ipynb On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 8:30 PM Fernando Marcos Wittmann < fern

Re: [scikit-learn] [ANN] scikit-learn 1.2 release

Thanks a lot Jeremie. This is a massive release :) On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 3:17 PM Jeremie du Boisberranger < jeremie.du-boisberran...@inria.fr> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > We're happy to announce the 1.2 release which you can install via pip or > conda: > > pip install -U scikit-learn > > or (

[scikit-learn] VOTE: Governance update: elevating voting rights

we need a 2/3 majority of the cast vote to pass the motion. Regards, Adrin ___ scikit-learn mailing list scikit-learn@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn

[scikit-learn] CFP: GitHub copilot for PRs

What do we think of GitHub copilot for PRs? Had anybody tried it? Is it something we think is a good idea at this point? I'm gonna try it on some smaller repos and see what it does. https://github.com/features/preview/copilot-x Cheers,

  1   2   >