Thanks! btw -- in general you might prefer annotated or signed tags
instead of "lightweight" tags, because now:
$> git describe 0.10.X
0.4-6302-g34334f5
$> git describe --tags 0.10.X
0.10
Cheers!
On Fri, 13 Jan 2012, Fabian Pedregosa wrote:
> it's now tagged as 0.10
--
=---
it's now tagged as 0.10
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Olivier Grisel
wrote:
> 2012/1/13 Yaroslav Halchenko :
>> I hope you would not consider me annoying...
>>
>>> could anyone push a corresponding tag for 0.10 release to github?
>>
>> meanwhile I will assume that it was this guy
>>
>> 0.9-bra
2012/1/13 Yaroslav Halchenko :
> I hope you would not consider me annoying...
>
>> could anyone push a corresponding tag for 0.10 release to github?
>
> meanwhile I will assume that it was this guy
>
> 0.9-branching-1735-g34334f5
Fabian?
--
Olivier
http://twitter.com/ogrisel - http://github.com/