On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Gael Varoquaux
wrote:
> Do you have any plans to generate notebooks from enhanced valid Python
> code? I would find that really handy as it would open the door to proving
> notebook-like functionality without really depending on the notebook for
> the development w
Olivier, Gael,
Thanks for the detailed suggestions.
The tutorial I'm preparing for is on Monday, July 16, so I'll be putting
in a lot of effort in the next couple weeks. I think for present
purposes, I'll plan to keep the tutorial and examples in the old
paradigm of rst + source code with skel
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 10:19:49AM -0700, Fernando Perez wrote:
> We've tried to make sure the format is as version control-friendly as
> possible, within the limits of accepting that it's json.
Do you have any plans to generate notebooks from enhanced valid Python
code? I would find that really
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Gael Varoquaux
wrote:
> I am very clearly -1 on this suggestion for several reasons:
You guys should definitely find a policy that works well for sklearn.
I just want to provide some info here, not push for using notebooks in
your default setup:
> a. I worry very
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 06:47:35PM +0200, Olivier Grisel wrote:
> None of this is doctested. And I don't want to put pollute the code
> with boilerplate to make that testable. It's up to the teacher to
> check that those exercises still work prior to using them in an
> interactive session.
I afrai
The tutorial itself and inline examples can stay in sphinx + doctests.
I agree this is a great format for online publishing and maintenance
checks using doctests.
But converting the 3 or 4 short exercises in notebook format would be great:
Here is the current code for the exercise snippets in my
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 12:24:43PM -0700, Jake Vanderplas wrote:
> I turned in the first draft of my PhD thesis yesterday,
Congratulations!
> Should the loaders be moved to sklearn.datasets, so the data can be
> used for general examples which are not associated with the tutorial?
> Or do you thi
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Jake Vanderplas
wrote:
> 3) Currently the exercises follow the format that Olivier set up in his
> tutorials, with a "skeleton" and a "solution" for each example script.
> On Fernando's suggestion, I'd like to move to using ipython notebooks
> for these examples.
2012/7/3 Jake Vanderplas :
> Hi folks,
> I turned in the first draft of my PhD thesis yesterday,
Congrats :)
> 1) The tutorial examples make use of several astronomy-specific
> datasets. These primarily come from publicly available data at the
> Sloan Digital Sky Survey [2], but I've done some p
Hi Jake
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Jake Vanderplas
wrote:
> 3) Currently the exercises follow the format that Olivier set up in his
> tutorials, with a "skeleton" and a "solution" for each example script.
> On Fernando's suggestion, I'd like to move to using ipython notebooks
> for these ex
Hi folks,
I turned in the first draft of my PhD thesis yesterday, so I finally
have the time to address my long to-do list for scikit-learn! I'll be
starting with finishing up my tutorial on machine learning for Astronomy
[1]. First of all, lots of thanks to Jaques for doing a close
read-thro
11 matches
Mail list logo
