On 11/05/2013 03:32 PM, Lars Buitinck wrote:
> 2013/11/6 Olivier Grisel :
>> Thanks for bringing this PR back. I completely forgot about it. Last
>> time I tried it worked on my box (I cannot reproduce @larsmans' issue
>> either). It would be great if more people could test it and review it.
> I do
2013/11/6 Olivier Grisel :
> Thanks for bringing this PR back. I completely forgot about it. Last
> time I tried it worked on my box (I cannot reproduce @larsmans' issue
> either). It would be great if more people could test it and review it.
I don't have time to check, please merge if you're conv
Thanks for bringing this PR back. I completely forgot about it. Last
time I tried it worked on my box (I cannot reproduce @larsmans' issue
either). It would be great if more people could test it and review it.
--
Olivier
---
Hi Andy,
The issue is targeted in PR #2185
(https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/pull/2355). There are a few
proposed ways of solving that problem, but it still needs to run a few more
benchmarks to determine the best one. Is it the problem you mean?
Thanks,
Karol
On Nov 5, 2013, at 1
Hey everybody.
I'm currently running 0.14.1 and I still have some trouble with MiniBatchKMeans
with the default reassignment settings.
Is that a known issue? About 200 of my 300 centers are unused and every couple
of iterations the same number are reassigned.
Setting reassignment ratio to 0 solve
