method as
>> efficient as possible. Along these lines, I started out using the
>> randomized SVD from sklearn but I was failing my tests generated with the
>> original Matlab code so I switched to numpy svd and then finally svdp in
>> pypropack.
>>
>> Cheers,
efficient as possible. Along these lines, I started out using the
> randomized SVD from sklearn but I was failing my tests generated with the
> original Matlab code so I switched to numpy svd and then finally svdp in
> pypropack.
>
> Cheers,
> Alex
> -- next part --
Couple of months back, I tried to use following
https://github.com/shriphani/robust_pcp/blob/master/robust_pcp.py
But I could not install pypropack develope by Jake Vanderplas
So I used randomized_svd from Scikitlearn instead of svdp in the code
mentioned above.
It worked "OK" for me.
On Wed, Apr
IF it was in scipy would it be backported to the older versions? How
would we handle that?
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 3:40 PM, Olivier Grisel
wrote:
> We could use PyPROPACK if it was contributed upstream in scipy ;)
>
> I know that some scipy maintainers don't appreciate arpack much and
> would lik
We could use PyPROPACK if it was contributed upstream in scipy ;)
I know that some scipy maintainers don't appreciate arpack much and
would like to see it replaced (or at least completed with propack).
--
Olivier
--
BPM
ontent-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
>
> Hey all.
> Was there some plan to add Robust PCA at some point? I vaguely remember
> a PR, but maybe I'm making things up.
> It sounds like a pretty cool model and is widely used:
> Sparse
> http://statweb.stanford.
ikit-learn-general
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
--
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 10:33:59 -0400
From: Andreas Mueller
Subject: [Scikit-learn-general] Robust PCA
To: scikit-learn-general@lists.sourceforge.net
Message-
> ___
> Scikit-learn-general mailing list
> Scikit-learn-general@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
-
Robust PCA is awesome - I would definitely like to see a good and fast
version. I had a version once upon a time, but it was neither good
*or* fast :)
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Andreas Mueller wrote:
> Hey all.
> Was there some plan to add Robust PCA at some point? I vaguely remember
> a
Hey all.
Was there some plan to add Robust PCA at some point? I vaguely remember
a PR, but maybe I'm making things up.
It sounds like a pretty cool model and is widely used:
Sparse
http://statweb.stanford.edu/~candes/papers/RobustPCA.pdf
[and I was just promised a good implementation]
Andy
10 matches
Mail list logo