I don’t know why these emails are so late, I sent them last week!!
But thanks anyway, I fixed that issue…
From: Joel Nothman [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2014 10:05 AM
To: scikit-learn-general
Subject: Re: [Scikit-learn-general] binarizer with more levels
yes, I
lasses to the declaration?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Joel Nothman [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 11, 2014 9:37 PM
>
> *To:* scikit-learn-general
> *Subject:* Re: [Scikit-learn-general] binarizer with more levels
>
you,
From: Joel Nothman
[mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 9:00 PM
To: scikit-learn-general
Subject: Re: [Scikit-learn-general] binarizer with more levels
If thresholds can be provided to the constructor then they are not estimated
[email protected]]
*Sent:* Thursday, September 11, 2014 9:37 PM
*To:* scikit-learn-general
*Subject:* Re: [Scikit-learn-general] binarizer with more levels
Good point. It should be straightforward in any case, something like:
class Quantizer(sklearn.base.TransformerMixin):
def __init__(self
I added
import sklearn.base.TransformerMixin
but it says no module named TransofrmerMixin
From: Joel Nothman [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 9:37 PM
To: scikit-learn-general
Subject: Re: [Scikit-learn-general] binarizer with more levels
Good point. It should
Thank you,
I’m not seeing “sklearn.base”. Which module do I need to import to be able to
use it?
Thanks,
From: Joel Nothman [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 9:37 PM
To: scikit-learn-general
Subject: Re: [Scikit-learn-general] binarizer with more levels
Good
gt;
>
>
> *From:* Joel Nothman [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 11, 2014 9:00 PM
>
> *To:* scikit-learn-general
> *Subject:* Re: [Scikit-learn-general] binarizer with more levels
>
>
>
> If thresholds can be provided to the constructor then t
Subject: Re: [Scikit-learn-general] binarizer with more levels
If thresholds can be provided to the constructor then they are not estimated
automatically from the training data. This is the sort of preprocessing you can
and should do with pandas.
On 12 September 2014 10:53, Pagliari, Roberto
gt;
>
>
> *From:* Joel Nothman [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 11, 2014 5:05 PM
> *To:* scikit-learn-general
> *Subject:* Re: [Scikit-learn-general] binarizer with more levels
>
>
>
> For quantizing or binning? Not currently.
>
>
>
&g
[mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 5:05 PM
To: scikit-learn-general
Subject: Re: [Scikit-learn-general] binarizer with more levels
For quantizing or binning? Not currently.
On 12 September 2014 06:31, Pagliari, Roberto
mailto:[email protected]>> wro
For quantizing or binning? Not currently.
On 12 September 2014 06:31, Pagliari, Roberto
wrote:
> Is there something like the binarizer with more levels (thresholds
> provided with input)
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
>
> --
Is there something like the binarizer with more levels (thresholds provided
with input)
Thanks
--
Want excitement?
Manually upgrade your production database.
When you want reliability, choose Perforce
Perforce version c
12 matches
Mail list logo
