Hi Federico,
no not yet - I just approached them recently regarding this issue - I
let you know as soon as I hear from them.
best,
Peter
2012/7/10 federico vaggi :
> Peter - did you get any updates from Kaggle? If not, is there anything that
> we as a community can do to sway them?
>
>
> On Sa
Peter - did you get any updates from Kaggle? If not, is there anything
that we as a community can do to sway them?
On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 7:46 PM, Emanuele Olivetti
wrote:
> On 07/05/2012 04:37 PM, Olivier Grisel wrote:
> > 2012/7/5 Emanuele Olivetti :
> >> On 07/05/2012 08:49 AM, Olivier Grisel
On 07/05/2012 04:37 PM, Olivier Grisel wrote:
> 2012/7/5 Emanuele Olivetti :
>> On 07/05/2012 08:49 AM, Olivier Grisel wrote:
>>> 2012/7/5 Peter Prettenhofer :
...
I've to check with the competition organizers whether its ok to put
the source code on github - I'll keep you poste
On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 01:44:43AM +0900, Mathieu Blondel wrote:
>This is how I did it in my calibration plot PR too:
>[2]https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/pull/882
I am so far behind on PR reviewing :(. I hadn't looked at that so far. I
am only starting to catch up with mail.
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 12:31 AM, Gael Varoquaux <
[email protected]> wrote:
> I must admit that so far I have been frowning away from adding code that
> does any plotting to scikit-learn. I tend to be worried about the
> maintenance code for such code. However, maybe having code that s
On Jul 5, 2012, at 17:31 , Gael Varoquaux wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 05:08:13PM +0200, Peter Prettenhofer wrote:
>> Indeed would be great to have a component to generate learning curves
>> in sklearn - I have some custom code lying around but it's rather
>> ugly...
>
> I must admit that so
On 07/05/2012 04:31 PM, Gael Varoquaux wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 05:08:13PM +0200, Peter Prettenhofer wrote:
>> Indeed would be great to have a component to generate learning curves
>> in sklearn - I have some custom code lying around but it's rather
>> ugly...
> I must admit that so far I h
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 04:57:25PM +0200, Peter Prettenhofer wrote:
> Model selection is my nemesis - little can be gained, everything lost :-)
Agreed!
> In the end I did 5x 5-fold CV - the error std between the repetitions
> was around 0.005.
I am a big fan of using ShuffleSplit to reduce the v
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 05:08:13PM +0200, Peter Prettenhofer wrote:
> Indeed would be great to have a component to generate learning curves
> in sklearn - I have some custom code lying around but it's rather
> ugly...
I must admit that so far I have been frowning away from adding code that
does an
2012/7/5 Peter Prettenhofer :
> 2012/7/5 Olivier Grisel :
>> 2012/7/5 Emanuele Olivetti :
>>> On 07/05/2012 09:45 AM, Andreas Mueller wrote:
Hey Peter.
Pretty awesome feat! Thanks for all the work you put into the ensemble
module!
A blog post about this competition would re
2012/7/5 Peter Prettenhofer :
> 2012/7/5 Olivier Grisel :
>> 2012/7/5 Emanuele Olivetti :
>>> On 07/05/2012 08:49 AM, Olivier Grisel wrote:
2012/7/5 Peter Prettenhofer :
> ...
>
> I've to check with the competition organizers whether its ok to put
> the source code on github -
2012/7/5 Olivier Grisel :
> 2012/7/5 Emanuele Olivetti :
>> On 07/05/2012 08:49 AM, Olivier Grisel wrote:
>>> 2012/7/5 Peter Prettenhofer :
...
I've to check with the competition organizers whether its ok to put
the source code on github - I'll keep you posted.
>>> If so that wo
2012/7/5 Olivier Grisel :
> 2012/7/5 Emanuele Olivetti :
>> On 07/05/2012 09:45 AM, Andreas Mueller wrote:
>>> Hey Peter.
>>> Pretty awesome feat! Thanks for all the work you put into the ensemble
>>> module!
>>>
>>> A blog post about this competition would really be great :)
>>>
>>> I was wonderin
2012/7/5 Emanuele Olivetti :
> On 07/05/2012 08:49 AM, Olivier Grisel wrote:
>> 2012/7/5 Peter Prettenhofer :
>>> ...
>>>
>>> I've to check with the competition organizers whether its ok to put
>>> the source code on github - I'll keep you posted.
>> If so that would be a great blog post topic. Loo
2012/7/5 Emanuele Olivetti :
> On 07/05/2012 09:45 AM, Andreas Mueller wrote:
>> Hey Peter.
>> Pretty awesome feat! Thanks for all the work you put into the ensemble
>> module!
>>
>> A blog post about this competition would really be great :)
>>
>> I was wondering, was there much difference in perf
On 07/05/2012 08:49 AM, Olivier Grisel wrote:
> 2012/7/5 Peter Prettenhofer :
>> ...
>>
>> I've to check with the competition organizers whether its ok to put
>> the source code on github - I'll keep you posted.
> If so that would be a great blog post topic. Looking forward to it.
>
Hi,
For what
On 07/05/2012 09:45 AM, Andreas Mueller wrote:
> Hey Peter.
> Pretty awesome feat! Thanks for all the work you put into the ensemble
> module!
>
> A blog post about this competition would really be great :)
>
> I was wondering, was there much difference in performance between GBRT
> and RF?
Hi,
I
Congratulations Peter! Excellent work as always!
Vlad
On Jul 5, 2012, at 00:48 , Emanuele Olivetti wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> As some of you may have already noticed, Peter (Prettenhofer) has
> just won a the "Online Product Sales" competition on kaggle.com
> beating 365 teams:
> http://www.kaggle.
If you get an OK - that would be absolutely amazing, especially if you
broke it down and explained the different tweaks.
Speaking for myself - I am only super interested in seeing how you set up
the grid search on the EC3 instances :)
Congratulations on a fantastic job, and this will draw a lot m
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Andreas Mueller wrote:
> Hey Peter.
> Pretty awesome feat! Thanks for all the work you put into the ensemble
> module!
>
> A blog post about this competition would really be great :)
>
> I was wondering, was there much difference in performance between GBRT
> and RF
Hey Peter.
Pretty awesome feat! Thanks for all the work you put into the ensemble
module!
A blog post about this competition would really be great :)
I was wondering, was there much difference in performance between GBRT
and RF?
We should do a "hall of fame" on the website listing citations an
Congratulations!!! Very well done
2012/7/5 Olivier Grisel
> 2012/7/5 Peter Prettenhofer :
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > thanks a lot for your congratulations. It has been a tight race indeed
> > and I have to consider myself lucky that I ended up on the first place
> > - as Olivier already said scor
2012/7/5 Peter Prettenhofer :
> Hi everybody,
>
> thanks a lot for your congratulations. It has been a tight race indeed
> and I have to consider myself lucky that I ended up on the first place
> - as Olivier already said score differences among the top teams are
> really small.
>
> Anyways, it's a
Hi everybody,
thanks a lot for your congratulations. It has been a tight race indeed
and I have to consider myself lucky that I ended up on the first place
- as Olivier already said score differences among the top teams are
really small.
Anyways, it's a great opportunity to "spread the word" - sk
Congrats!
I have participated as well and do not have the time to look into the
problem before it finishes. It is rather impressive as many regular winners
participating and Peter stands out.
Best,
LI, Wei
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Gilles Louppe wrote:
> Congratulations Peter :-)
>
> On
Congratulations Peter :-)
On 5 July 2012 04:57, xinfan meng wrote:
> Congratulations to Perter. This is a great demonstration and advertisement
> for scikit-learn. I really want to know how Peter develop his wining
> strategy. Have he written something about this?
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 9
Congratulations to Perter. This is a great demonstration and advertisement
for scikit-learn. I really want to know how Peter develop his wining
strategy. Have he written something about this?
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 9:21 AM, Gael Varoquaux <
[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 04
>
> As some of you may have already noticed, Peter (Prettenhofer) has
> just won a the "Online Product Sales" competition on kaggle.com
> beating 365 teams:
>
congratulations peter. this is wonderful news.
--
Live Security
On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 11:48:17PM +0100, Emanuele Olivetti wrote:
> As some of you may have already noticed, Peter (Prettenhofer) has
> just won a the "Online Product Sales" competition on kaggle.com
> beating 365 teams:
> http://www.kaggle.com/c/online-sales/leaderboard
This is indeed great. Cer
2012/7/5 Emanuele Olivetti :
> Dear All,
>
> As some of you may have already noticed, Peter (Prettenhofer) has
> just won a the "Online Product Sales" competition on kaggle.com
> beating 365 teams:
> http://www.kaggle.com/c/online-sales/leaderboard
> The competition was about predicting the monthly
Dear All,
As some of you may have already noticed, Peter (Prettenhofer) has
just won a the "Online Product Sales" competition on kaggle.com
beating 365 teams:
http://www.kaggle.com/c/online-sales/leaderboard
The competition was about predicting the monthly online sales of
a product. In my opinion
31 matches
Mail list logo
