Hey Gael,
I am sorry that I missed this comment of yours -
> > 1. The design of multiple metric support is important and would bring
an immense usability gain.
> But it will also require a framework of its own. I would say that this is
to be considered in a second step.
Could you expand a littl
Hi all,
thanks a lot for the comments!
I've just edited/formatted my prop. based on all of your comments...
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/wiki/GSoC-2015-Proposal:-Multiple-metric-support-for-CV-and-grid_search-and-other-general-improvements
Only thing to be done is to plan what I
On 03/24/2015 07:39 PM, Vlad Niculae wrote:
> Hi Raghav, hi everyone,
>
> If I may, I have a very high-level comment on your proposal. It clearly shows
> that you are very involved in the project and understand the internals well.
> However, I feel like it’s written from a way too technical per
Hi Vlad!!
Thanks a tonne for the detailed review of my proposal. :)
> Your proposal contains implementation details, but little or no
discussion of why each change is important and how it impacts users
Yes, I'll add a section discussing the motivation of the various
deliverable. (which actually
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 07:39:17PM -0400, Vlad Niculae wrote:
> 1. The design of multiple metric support is important and would bring an
> immense usability gain.
But it will also require a framework of its own. I would say that this is
to be considered in a second step.
G
-
Hi Raghav, hi everyone,
If I may, I have a very high-level comment on your proposal. It clearly shows
that you are very involved in the project and understand the internals well.
However, I feel like it’s written from a way too technical perspective. Your
proposal contains implementation detai
I agree with everything Andy says. I think the core developers are very
enthusiastic to have a project along the lines of "Finish all the things
that need finishing", but it's very impractical to do so much context
switching both for students and mentors/reviewers.
One of the advantages of GSoC is
Hi Andy,
Thanks a lot for your feedback... I'll update my proposal wiki based on
your guidelines and also submit the same to melange too by today!
Thanks,
R
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 3:10 AM, Andreas Mueller wrote:
> Hi Raghav.
>
> I feel that your proposal lacks some focus.
> I'd remove the
Hi Raghav.
I feel that your proposal lacks some focus.
I'd remove the two:
Mallow's Cp for LASSO / LARS
Implement built in abs max scaler, Nesterov's momentum and finish up the
Multilayer Perceptron module.
And as discussed in this thread probably also
Forge a self sufficient ML tutorial base
can you please also upload it to melange?
On 03/22/2015 08:52 PM, Raghav R V wrote:
2 things :
* The subject should have been "Multiple Metric Support in grid_search
and cross_validation modules and other general improvements" and not
multiple metric learning! Sorry for that!
* The link was n
Thanks for all the good comments!! I'll replace that section of my proposal
with some other more important work! :)
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 7:53 PM, Matthieu Brucher <
matthieu.bruc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > For practical purposes, I currently know of 2 (3?) sklearn books
> > published with PACKT.
> For practical purposes, I currently know of 2 (3?) sklearn books
> published with PACKT. There is also an OReilly book coming up:
> http://shop.oreilly.com/product/0636920030515.do
2 general books, 1 cookbook and I think there is another one
half-written as well. Didn't know about O'Reilly, good
On 03/22/2015 07:57 PM, Raghav R V wrote:
>
> 2. Given that there is a huge interest among students in learning
> about ML, do you think it would be within the scope of/beneficial to
> skl to have all the exercises and/or concepts, from a good quality
> book (ESL / PRML / Murphy) or an academi
2 things :
* The subject should have been "Multiple Metric Support in grid_search and
cross_validation modules and other general improvements" and not multiple
metric learning! Sorry for that!
* The link was not available due to the trailing "." (dot), which has been
fixed now!
Thanks
R
On Mon,
>
> 1. the link is broken
>
Ah! Sorry :) -
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/wiki/GSoC-2015-Proposal:-Multiple-metric-support-for-CV-and-grid_search-and-other-general-improvements
.
2. that sounds quite difficult and unfortunately conducive to cheating
>
Hmm... Should I then simply op
1. the link is broken
2. that sounds quite difficult and unfortunately conducive to cheating
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 7:57 PM, Raghav R V wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 1. This is my proposal for the multiple metric learning project as a wiki
> page -
> https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/wiki/GSoC-
16 matches
Mail list logo
