Re: [Scikit-learn-general] sequential feature selection algorithms

2015-04-27 Thread Joel Nothman
I suspect this method is underreported by any particular name, as it's a straightforward greedy search. It is also very close to what I think many researchers do in system development or report in system analysis, albeit with more automation. In the case of KNN, I would think metric learning could

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] sequential feature selection algorithms

2015-04-27 Thread Andreas Mueller
Maybe we would want mrmr first? http://penglab.janelia.org/proj/mRMR/ On 04/27/2015 06:46 PM, Sebastian Raschka wrote: >> I guess that could be done, but has a much higher complexity than RFE. > Oh yes, I agree, the sequential feature algorithms are definitely > computationally more costly. > >

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] sequential feature selection algorithms

2015-04-27 Thread Sebastian Raschka
> I guess that could be done, but has a much higher complexity than RFE. Oh yes, I agree, the sequential feature algorithms are definitely computationally more costly. > It seems interesting. Is that really used in practice and is there any > literature evaluating it? I am not sure how often

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] sequential feature selection algorithms

2015-04-27 Thread Andreas Mueller
That is like a one-step look-ahead feature selection? I guess that could be done, but has a much higher complexity than RFE. RFE works for anything that returns "importances", not just linear models. It doesn't really work for KNN, as you say. [I wouldn't say non-parametric models. Trees are prett