I am not aware of anyone tracking liblinear.
There is certainly no automatic update.
On 03/23/2015 08:05 PM, Charles Martin wrote:
> On liblinear--can you clarify for me how you incorporate updates from
> the main site?
>
> Do you make an effort to stay up to date with latest changes directly
> by
On liblinear--can you clarify for me how you incorporate updates from
the main site?
Do you make an effort to stay up to date with latest changes directly
by recompiling liblinear each time a new release is made?
--
Dive
oh thanks
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Joel Nothman wrote:
> I should have replied here. Liblinear with sample weights:
> https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/pull/2784
>
> On 20 March 2015 at 09:12, Charles Martin wrote:
>>
>> Yes and thanks
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> > On Mar
I should have replied here. Liblinear with sample weights:
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/pull/2784
On 20 March 2015 at 09:12, Charles Martin wrote:
> Yes and thanks
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Mar 19, 2015, at 2:36 PM, Andreas Mueller wrote:
> >
> > Hi Charles.
> > That is u
Yes and thanks
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 19, 2015, at 2:36 PM, Andreas Mueller wrote:
>
> Hi Charles.
> That is unrelated to the GSoC mail you responded to, right?
>
> I think updating liblinear sound like a good idea, if it doesn't end up
> being to complicated.
> Allowing instance weigh
Hi Charles.
That is unrelated to the GSoC mail you responded to, right?
I think updating liblinear sound like a good idea, if it doesn't end up
being to complicated.
Allowing instance weights is certainly something we'd like to have.
You should check how far our code diverged, but I think for lib
