Re: [Scikit-learn-general] [ANN] Scikit-learn 0.17 released

2015-11-06 Thread Bertrand Thirion
Many thanks to all contributors, and especially to Andreas ! Best, Bertrand - Mail original - > De: "Andreas Mueller" > À: "scikit-learn-general" > Envoyé: Vendredi 6 Novembre 2015 01:45:18 > Objet: [Scikit-learn-general] [ANN] Scikit-learn 0.17 released > > Hey everybody. > > I'm hap

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] Binary wheel packages for Linux are coming

2016-04-14 Thread Bertrand Thirion
Fantastic ! thanks, Bertrand - Mail original - > De: "Olivier Grisel" > À: "scikit-learn-general" > Envoyé: Mercredi 13 Avril 2016 23:52:22 > Objet: Re: [Scikit-learn-general] Binary wheel packages for Linux are coming > > OpenBLAS 0.2.18 has been released yesterday with many fixes se

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] Scoring multiple test samples together rather than separately

2014-01-14 Thread Bertrand Thirion
- Mail original - > De: "Adelina Grant" > À: scikit-learn-general@lists.sourceforge.net > Envoyé: Mardi 14 Janvier 2014 17:34:22 > Objet: [Scikit-learn-general] Scoring multiple test samples together > rather than separately > Hi > I built a GMM classifier with the scikit learn package

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] [GSoC] Wrap up post

2014-08-22 Thread Bertrand Thirion
Impressive. These are long-standing issues. Thanks for the patches. Bertrand - Mail original - > De: "Manoj Kumar" > À: scikit-learn-general@lists.sourceforge.net > Envoyé: Vendredi 22 Août 2014 01:35:13 > Objet: [Scikit-learn-general] [GSoC] Wrap up post > Hi, > A quick wrap up pos

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] [ANN] scikit-learn 0.16.0 is out!

2015-03-27 Thread Bertrand Thirion
Great ! Many thanks to Olivier and Andy ! Best, Bertrand - Mail original - > De: "Gael Varoquaux" > À: scikit-learn-general@lists.sourceforge.net > Envoyé: Vendredi 27 Mars 2015 18:22:30 > Objet: Re: [Scikit-learn-general] [ANN] scikit-learn 0.16.0 is out! > > Congratulations Olivier an

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] GSoC 2012 pre-application

2012-03-30 Thread Bertrand Thirion
Regarding clustering algorithms, I would suggest to have a look at convex formulations, that can be advantageous for the sake of convergence/stability, wrt standard algorithms that never have any guarantee. Among others: - http://www.icml-2011.org/papers/419_icmlpaper.pdf - http://www.google.fr

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] Renaming clustering parameters

2012-05-11 Thread Bertrand Thirion
> The current idea would be to use n_clusters for all clustering > algorithms and n_components > for GMM. +1 B -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] (no subject)

2013-01-24 Thread Bertrand Thirion
If you use a cross validation scheme, where you estimate the residuals variance on left-out data and compare it to the variance of the model with the intercept only, then R^2 can be negative. This approach is an alternative to adjusted R^2 for model selection, and probably makes more sense when

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] K means on a sphere

2013-01-24 Thread Bertrand Thirion
As alluded previously, you need to find a way to compute the centroid by minimizing the sum of squared distances to a given set of points within each cluster. However, it is true that re-projecting the euclidean mean to the sphere would approximate well the theoretical solution in most cases.

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] PyCON Australia 2013

2013-03-14 Thread Bertrand Thirion
- Mail original - > De: "Andreas Mueller" > À: scikit-learn-general@lists.sourceforge.net > Envoyé: Jeudi 14 Mars 2013 13:30:34 > Objet: Re: [Scikit-learn-general] PyCON Australia 2013 > > Btw, don't get me wrong, I think it is great what INRIA and Gael's > team to. > But singling them

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] PyCON Australia 2013

2013-03-14 Thread Bertrand Thirion
> It would be nice to clarify if INRIA is still paying an engineer for > the project and if so whether he's full-time or has other duties. Yes, INRIA has been paying a full time engineer (Fabian, then Jaques) on the project since January 2010. Bertrand -

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] Defining a Density Estimation Interface

2013-07-08 Thread Bertrand Thirion
- Mail original - > De: "Jacob Vanderplas" > À: scikit-learn-general@lists.sourceforge.net > Envoyé: Dimanche 7 Juillet 2013 19:10:38 > Objet: [Scikit-learn-general] Defining a Density Estimation Interface > Hi, > I've been working on a big rewrite of the Ball Tree and KD Tree in > sklea

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] Defining a Density Estimation Interface

2013-07-09 Thread Bertrand Thirion
- Mail original - > De: "Skipper Seabold" > À: scikit-learn-general@lists.sourceforge.net > Envoyé: Lundi 8 Juillet 2013 19:40:36 > Objet: Re: [Scikit-learn-general] Defining a Density Estimation Interface > > On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Bertrand

[Scikit-learn-general] default params for precision_recall_fscore_support and precision_score

2013-08-07 Thread Bertrand Thirion
Dear all, In the sklearn.metrics module, the precision_recall_fscore_support and precision_score have different default value for the "average" parameter, which seems a bit counterintuitive -- but I did not go deep into the code. Is this really the intended behavior ? def precision_score(y_t

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] Release 0.14: tagged and pushed!

2013-08-08 Thread Bertrand Thirion
Congratulations ! Bertrand - Mail original - > De: "Gael Varoquaux" > À: scikit-learn-general@lists.sourceforge.net > Envoyé: Jeudi 8 Août 2013 01:18:09 > Objet: [Scikit-learn-general] Release 0.14: tagged and pushed! > > Hi Scikiters, > > I have tagged and pushed release 0.14. > > Vl