Re: [scite] stage #1 - job queue encapsulation within a class

2005-10-24 Thread Robert Roessler
Neil Hodgson wrote: Robert Roessler: I just looked at this... I am [a little] surprised to find that SciTE is not structured the same as Scintilla vis-a-vis a "platform" abstraction layer with specific implementations as required. SciTE uses Scintilla's platform for some things. In any c

Re: [scite] stage #1 - job queue encapsulation within a class

2005-10-24 Thread Neil Hodgson
Robert Roessler: > I just looked at this... I am [a little] surprised to find that SciTE > is not structured the same as Scintilla vis-a-vis a "platform" > abstraction layer with specific implementations as required. SciTE uses Scintilla's platform for some things. > In any case, as GLib supp

Re: [scite] stage #1 - job queue encapsulation within a class

2005-10-24 Thread April White
Neil Hodgson wrote: Oh, at this time, the SciTEJobQueue.h file contains some debugging define's and stuff, but they are only active when DEBUG is defined, but I also left in a line that define'd it. These are quite compiler-specific. Yep. I forgot to disable them. I do not know how

Re: [scite] stage #1 - job queue encapsulation within a class

2005-10-24 Thread Neil Hodgson
April White: > Oh, at this time, the SciTEJobQueue.h file contains some debugging > define's and stuff, but they are only active when DEBUG is defined, but > I also left in a line that define'd it. These are quite compiler-specific. > 2. implement a means whereby a direct call to Execute() is