Walter Franzini wrote:
On Sun, Sep 27, 1998 at 09:22:03AM +0200, gregor wrote:
OK, you're right.
but then i would prefer
libctapi-.x.yy.so
because, there is no need for symoblic links
Yes, but when you replace a library whit a newer version you must
recompile all
No, not yet. Are you up for it ? It would be really nice to have
something that tells what is wrong with a person's CT-API library.
Thanks
Dave
On Sun, 27 Sep 1998, you wrote:
Have someone already writed a program to test a ctapi library?
I mean a `complete' test.
With :
1) CTAPI
