On Sun, Sep 27, 1998 at 09:33:55AM -0500, David Corcoran wrote:
> No, not yet. Are you up for it ? It would be really nice to have
> something that tells what is wrong with a person's CT-API library.
Yes. I hope to finish CT-API for the Argus 210 CT in a couple of weeks,
but I want test my w
No, not yet. Are you up for it ? It would be really nice to have
something that tells what is wrong with a person's CT-API library.
Thanks
Dave
On Sun, 27 Sep 1998, you wrote:
>Have someone already writed a program to test a ctapi library?
>
>I mean a `complete' test.
>With :
>1) CTAPI
Walter Franzini wrote:
> Have someone already writed a program to test a ctapi library?
>
> I mean a `complete' test.
> With :
> 1) CTAPI implementation
> 2) CTBCS check
> 3) ISO7816-4 commands
i'm on it
bye
gregor
***
Linux Smart C
Have someone already writed a program to test a ctapi library?
I mean a `complete' test.
With :
1) CTAPI implementation
2) CTBCS check
3) ISO7816-4 commands
--
Ciao Walter.
C makes it easy for you to shoot yourself in the foot. C++ makes that
harder, but when you do, it blows away your whole