Re: MUSCLE mismatch in transmit_to_icc

1999-06-11 Thread Pete Chown
David Corcoran wrote: > ( I really need to seek some help in naming/numbering > conventions ) Personally I tend to give things release numbers like 1.2.3. The first number is a major revision, the second is a minor revision and the third is generated by the source code control system. The idea

Re: MUSCLE mismatch in transmit_to_icc

1999-06-10 Thread David Corcoran
Hi, The new release .108 of the resource manager will require the new drivers: 1.5 drivers. ( I really need to seek some help in naming/numbering conventions ) The 1.5 drivers have the correct transmit_to_icc mapping and work with the ReaderFactory. I uploaded everything yesterday.. Than

MUSCLE mismatch in transmit_to_icc

1999-06-09 Thread Alex Pilosov
I'm getting coredumps because: in ReaderFactory::TransmitToICC (ReaderFactory.cpp:511), IFD_transmit_to_icc is called with 6 params 510 rv = (*IFD_transmit_to_icc)( SendPci, CommandData,CommandSize, 511 ResponseData, &ResponseSize,&RecvPci ) However,